This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 8108551? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The wall is a much better investment. Just want to say that it does not cost 3 billion to make a website. Please if I'm wrong correct me but I have always found it surprising a website could cost that much. I bet they used it as an excuse to funnel money through to give to themselves while saying it was all for the website.
[–] guinness2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The broken Obamacare website, which never worked properly even when people aren't getting timeout errors, cost somewhere between two and five billion dollars.
No, there is no reason any website should cost more than the GDP of the Maldives.