You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] ZYX321 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No one is blaring Chelsea over the loud speakers preventing anyone from sleeping at night. Chelsea is as free to speak as anyone else. It's other people who are making the decision to rebroadcast her. If it weren't for Voat, I wouldn't know that Chelsea Clinton was even a thing still. "But you need to be informed so that-" and that's the exact same defense any news outlet would make. The more attention you pay to it, the more money there is to be made in rebroadcasting what she says.

You're right. It is freedom of speech. And freedom of the press. Don't know why anyone downvoated you for that. (Except I do)

4
-4

[–] rightwingcirclejerk 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

because truth hurts?