You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] guinness2 ago  (edited ago)

Trump is only appointing these people to dismantle the EPA because he doesn't believe in climate change.

That sounds like a standard Huffington Post or Salon news header, however it's fake news.

However, Trump has never said he doesn't believe in climate change: he's critical of the multi-billion dollar climate-change industry and the findings of the scientists who have their funding continued if they get the "right" results, however what you said is garbage.

Why do you think we shouldn't be critical of climate change claims?

Is it too sacred to question?

0
0

[–] Terrorist [S] ago 

When I say climate change I more so mean man made climate change, which he very much denies.

Your only real reason to be skeptical is because the scientist might be biased? That's just insane.

It's not "too sacred" to question, it has simply just been answered already. 97% of scientist agree that man made activity is causing climate change. If you don't believe them, then I simply can't convince you.

0
0

[–] guinness2 ago  (edited ago)

97% of scientist agree that man made activity is causing climate change.

https://ospace.otis.edu/files/M3013d0f7afa1f32a5a75afd3d8e5f5d0.jpg

Do you often allow the thoughts in other people's heads to control what you think, or just the ones that wear a white coat?

That's just insane.

Why is it insane to question scientist?

Do you think it's insane to question the "research" from scientists who are funded by the tobacco industry and claim there is no link between smoking and cancer?

Do you think it's insane to question the "research" from soda companies which claim there is no connection between obesity and consuming their sugary drinks?

What if I paid a hall full of scientists to claim the sky was red... would that make it true?