This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] SparkS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
it is dog. today more than ever nato lost its meaning. and thats proved by the factual military situation around the world in present. what that mf did there was a political act. it was just like what i said nato is for a long long loooong time ago, a political and economical pressure organization used by certain power cells from the west against some states inside the eu/nato alliance to gain diverse things(especially economical). the rest is bullshit for retards. on the other hand its understandable cause nato..... its so much to explain here at least from the perspective that the nato word has a distortioned sense in the media.... practically most of the interests made nato to be actually an european army allied with basically usa and their interests were very different on many aspects. on one hand it was mainly like a marriage forcefully kept for the eyes of the world while in its essence was rotten as fuck.
[–] AreWeSure 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
I don't care what your opinion is, I was pointing out the fact that the general did not say NATO itself is obsolete.
[–] SparkS ago
u should care cause my op[inon among facts is the right one. that general said some parts to diminish a bigger truth from many points of view. i said that was a political declaration, nvm the reasons. and thats what it was, a political response made by a military oficial. i can smell fear in its words from a mile away. and i know for what hes afraid... the $$$$ cutoffs for start but the truth is much more painful for nato than that...