0
39

[–] pessimisticsteel 0 points 39 points (+39|-0) ago 

HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH

0
10

[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

If it was than all hell will break loose

0
8

[–] Dildo-Shwaggins 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I like to think he gave Wikileaks access to certain systems in the totally unlikely event he died.

0
6

[–] DiscontentedMajority 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

In death, an anon has a name.

0
6

[–] Webtheweb 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Emphasis, was

0
18

[–] TAThatBoomerang 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Why does this have so many downvoats?

0
25

[–] allthe_gundams 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

Shills.

0
12

[–] TAThatBoomerang 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

I must assume that it is. This post is not out of place, and Voat usually only downvoates when the source is crap-tier (which this one isn't).

0
6

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

If you want to get even more depressed, go to this story on the top of /r/wikileaks and look at all the shills spouting DNC talking points.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5hwgqw/julian_assange_associate_it_was_a_leak_not_a_hack/

0
8

[–] WitnesstheSalt 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Right now the magic range for downvoats seems to be the mid-twenties. If you see that many in short order it's a brigade. It could be a paid shill effort, or it could be a small cadre of determined assholes, the effect is much the same.

There's also occasional throwaway accounts posting anti-Republician, anti-conservative, and/or anti-Trump shit that gets at least a score of upvoats before being downvoated into oblivion once it's noted the poster is the Voat equivalent of a twitter egg.

Update: Woo! I must have touched a nerve, someone decided to suicide on my bayonet.

21
-21

20
-18

23
-22

0
15

[–] kinneys 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

You can keep screaming FAKE NEWS all you want.

To me that term screams, "read this article it must be important."

It has the opposite affect on most people. Thinking people.

12
-12

17
-17

0
13

[–] kinneys 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

The True Nobel Peace Prize Winner: Julian Assanage

I love this guy. What an absolute hero.

1
7

[–] archie01 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

When is the last time someone credible has seen him alive?

0
11

[–] Drain0 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Hey associate... Is your boss alive?

0
6

[–] drj2 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

for real though :( what the hell is going on

0
7

[–] Markon101 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Assange saved the world from Shillery. Shillery and her ilk know the Russians didn't do anything. Anyone who has ever used a VPN knows that you can appear to be in any country you want. The CIA is probably lying, incompetent, or more likely both. It is insane to state without any evidence that Russia "hacked" our election. Firstly, they did not hack anything. The voting machines would have been rigged for Hillary if anything, but they are offline computers so it is unlikely for there to have been any coordinated attack on them. Paper ballots were all good. Shillery won the popular vote (maybe fraudulently) as well. The only thing that damaged Shillery were the leaks from WIkileaks. They were only damaging because there was obvious corruption and scandal written all over those emails. Russia didn't write the emails even if they helped get ahold of them! My thinking is that it was a sort of "counter coup" by US citizens who were in the government. I think the leaks came from within. Although it sure would be a good idea to use a VPN service or TOR routed through Russian servers to make it easier to get away with leaking.

0
6

[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

The "fake news" retards are really losing it on this one. Hahahahaha

0
5

[–] EndDrugAndOtherWars 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The fake news turns out to be a story about there being fake news. Read all the articles saying it was the Russians and it is as all legalese saying it's the Russians without actually saying it's the Russians. And demonizing Alex Jones, when most of the time it is more useful to just ignore him. Now they will criticize Trump for going on his show, but where was their outrage when leftist hero Noam Chomsky when on the Alex Jones Show to discuss media manipulation?

Find fuck, blending truth with fiction; it's a fake news story within a fake news story with in a fake news stories, a lite within the lie within the lie.

We are blurring the lines between the real word and a controlled world every day with the help of technology and soon we will reach the singularity with computers and vr and our mind and senses and we will all be truly fucked; or we will reverse the again process and become one with the machines and all explore space together.

I'm high.

0
1

[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I saw you going off the rails and then read the last sentence. Lol

load more comments ▼ (42 remaining)