0
8

[–] gazillions 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Betcha this another one of those stupid bots that clicks upvoat X10 when you downvoat it.

What a fucking stupid waste of time and money.

0
5

[–] Crow_T_robocop 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Unless Russia literally hacked into the voting booths and changed votes, then the election results are fair. Russia didn't make me vote for Trump or a Republican. The shitty policies of the Democratic party and the shit stain they selected to run for President were deciding factors for me. Plus the fact that I think Trump will MAGA.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] Ina_Pickle 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I half suspect he was reelected due to voter fraud. You may have missed the news from the US, but they did find fraud. It was perpetuated by the Democrats though. Not a Russian in sight.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] olinneserpona 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

36 upgoats after 15min. Then I clicked downgoat it had 4 upgoats. The bots bring it up, we take it down.

0
5

[–] goatsandbros 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Oh look, another bot-upvoated post.

0
3

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Why are they saturating the front page with false narratives and/or fake news?

Both sides are pushing fake news stories to the top of news aggregators because extreme view points have successfully infiltrated the news narrative that has allowed for fringe groups to be included in the selection of talking points for the recent election. The girth of both extremes will shrink as the election sinks into the past, and the rational people from both sides start to meet again in the middle for compromise rather than solidifying your personal beliefs among groups of like minded thinkers.

Why do they upvote their own posts?

Everyone would like to get their view points to the eyes of as many people as possible. Some people do it organically, and some do it mischievously way.

Why do they flood attack everyone and everything which presents an alternative viewpoint?

Depending on the news aggregator you are using, the ability for people to group up with like minded individuals has grown. Voat has exploded in right-sided view points since Reddit has made it clear that they no longer want dissenting opinions and natural discussions. People will flock to the location they are most accepted. If a viewpoint that is inherently against the views of the group, it is as easy as shooting a sitting duck for the group to gather on the faults of the alternative viewpoint without much rebuttal.

Why are they comparing the legal donation of campaign funds with the illegal hacking of domestic computer servers?

Some people like to see the illegal nature of their politicians as virtuous as they are doing it for the "right" reasons. One side ignores the faults of their leader while pointing out the faults in the opposing leader. Since most of the recent news about legality has come to light, the people, truly, have very little facts to make up their minds. They will stick with what feels comfortable the most.

I'll tell you why, shall I?

Trump Supporters are as much Nazis as Hillary Supporters are as much Nazis... But in reality, both groups are so far from that definition, that it is akin to calling your opponent the devil, or anti-christ when trying to appeal to emotion, rather than their logic and reason.


What I don't understand is the reason for this post. If this post made money for the poster, it makes sense, paid shills are a reality. But if OP is trying to change opinions and appeal to the rationality of this very one-sided news aggregator, OP is going about it all wrong.

1
3

[–] Aged 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I dunno about "our" election, but it is because it's a lie.

8
-7

0
1

[–] FidgetyImp 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

SHILLKAKAAAAAAAAA

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)