You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] WhiteSoIMustBeRacist ago 

One more follow up. Their FB page is more active than CNN beause they post substantially more junk. CNN posted 732 articles while Breitbart posted 3000. The difference is that CNN actually tries to fact check and practice solid journalism. Breitbart finds a single email and then writes a bullshit article as if it's groundbreaking earth shattering news. And of course the dummy conservatives on FB eat it up.

0
0

[–] SnapeDoggyDogg ago 

You must be kidding me. Even President Obama, who is clearly on the left, makes fun of CNN for being bullshit. Their reputation does not reflect what you are saying. And besides, this type of argument about which journalism is more solid is not based on anything scientific. You're just blowing hot air out of your ass. What you're doing here is not critical thinking. You're just making up statements, based on zero evidence, that are impossible to either prove or disprove and then strutting like a pigeon. You might choose to argue against me quoting Breitbart's 45 million unique reader statistic, but at least I have a source. I don't just accuse people of things based on my own bare assumptions. You're a hypocrite and a joke. In fact, what you are doing here is literally a perfect example of confirmation bias. And when I say literally, I actually mean that word in its original meaning.

0
0

[–] WhiteSoIMustBeRacist ago 

CNN is biased. But trying to defend Breitbart by criticizing CNN is a lot like trying to defend eating a steaming pile of shit by saying pizza is bad for you.