2
75

[–] WitnesstheSalt 2 points 75 points (+77|-2) ago 

I see what you did there. Pretty sneaky.

Though I think a fair take on the Huffpoo is it's a glorified blog aggregate, largely using unpaid labor and political editors. Prime example of the political editors: running that nasty little footnote on any Trump article for several months, regardless of content or context. As for the unpaid labor, well, you get what you pay for.

1
11

[–] GoodGodKirk 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

You mean liberal opinions and unresearched facts?

0
11

[–] pepe_was_framed 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Yeah. I can't really stand it. Is it possible to get just 'news' from any resource? The rightwingers have the same problem, from breitbart to washington examiner, there's plenty of bias.

What i end up having to do is read both sides of an argument then argue myself with them.

I'd love to be able to read a fairly unbiased copy of actual news not just 'political experts responding to trumps latest tweets' (looking at you reason.com and msnbc!)

Any ideas?

0
1

[–] WitnesstheSalt 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I take issue with your use of the word facts in that sentence.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] maxoverdrive 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This only goes to show that the vast majority of voters shouldn't , well , be voting. Our founding fathers knew that was an enormous fucking mistake, it's time to listen to the people who actually created this nation of ours rather than the liberal fucking panty-waists who came after. After all, who's more credibly: a bunch of dip-shit losers on the internet, or people who actually fought, and risked their lives, to create the republic?

I know what worthless child-fucking redditors would say - but you dumb motherfuckers are voaters. What do you think?

1
36

[–] Rummel 1 points 36 points (+37|-1) ago 

May Kek bless this post

3
34

[–] CANCEL-CAT-FACTS 3 points 34 points (+37|-3) ago  (edited ago)

That is just your opinion. Thanks.

2
5

[–] I_like_paint 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

Are you replying to a bot?

0
6

[–] ExpertShitposter 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I also like paint.

1
4

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Thank you for subscribing to Ant Facts! Did you know there are over 12,000 species of ant around the world? Ants can be found in almost any biosphere on the planet.

0
1

[–] duk 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
21

[–] goatsandbros 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Nicely done, op.

0
20

[–] Skyrock 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

What's this, are you trying to trick the shills into buying the more expensive downgoats?

0
5

[–] MagicHamsta 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Why doesn't Atko just sell "premium" downgoats directly to shills.

The twist is that they won't actually be visible until users press a tiny button off to the side because they're "premium".

11
-10

0
15

[–] novictim 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Huffpo is unabashedly anti-Free speech and lead the way in censorship and banning based on user's political leanings.

1
11

[–] strategema 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

I find this hard to believe given their diverse editorial staff.

0
3

[–] purr 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

When I first looked at your comment, I read "diverse" as "divisive," what whatever: both are true!

0
9

[–] Xeros 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Let's see if @Terrorist can form a decent rebuttal against this, my guess is no.

9
13

[–] ShillBuster 9 points 13 points (+22|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Let's see if @Terrorist can form a decent rebuttal against this, my guess is no.

I don't own that account, but I wrote the post which this thread parodies.

I have already "rebutted" it. OP is lying. Huffington Post does not have a bias rating of extreme on MediaBiasFactCheck. That is why OP (probably also you on an alt account) left the link out of his post. He apparently didn't want people checking his "facts".

Also, no accusations of them printing outright fake news as there are with Breitbart.

Also, they are not quite so biased that their own CEO takes a job as Hillary's campaign manager. That's next level stuff.

0
5

[–] Xeros 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

If you read the post you'd notice that he doesn't say that rating comes from MediaBiasFactCheck. The author is pulling the rating out of his ass in just the same way as MediaBiasFactCheck is. If you don't pay attention to details your posts won't have the bite you want.

0
0

[–] MiauFrito 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

>$11 worth of upvotes

0
1

[–] Kylan 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Is Terrorist the resident sane liberal?

0
2

[–] Xeros 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Terrorist posted the mirror image of this post yesterday. The pursuant conversation was perhaps not constructive.

2
-1

[–] ShillBuster 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

the resident sane liberal?

You can have an upvote.

6
-6
load more comments ▼ (57 remaining)