5
282

[–] CANCEL-CAT-FACTS 5 points 282 points (+287|-5) ago 

That is just your opinion. Thanks.

0
141

[–] WhoFramedReaderRabit 0 points 141 points (+141|-0) ago  (edited ago)

but OP used the word FACT: ...so it must be true, plus someone who has a brand new account named SimpleAndFair must be reputable.../s

0
73

[–] Titus-of-Voat 0 points 73 points (+73|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Used the word FACT and used a URL with FACTCHECK, that's like double the factuality. Two times even.

0
14

[–] midnight_rider 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Sounds like a plumbing company

0
4

[–] DocterBS 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

If it is clearly shill then maybe deleting al the accounts that upvote it. I wouldn't mind making 1 new account for security reasons. I bet they mind making 500 new accounts.

0
3

[–] Laurentius_the_pyro 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

OP is a truly massive fag.

0
70

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 70 points (+70|-0) ago 

Heh member for 2.9 hours...

0
26

[–] chags 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

Why are you talking to a bot?

0
42

[–] CANCEL-CAT-FACTS 0 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago 

Thank you for subscribing to cat facts.

2
11

[–] Subutex 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

but but .. did you even read his post? It's clearly satire. It reeks bias, uses loaded words, trying to appeal to emotions and stereotypes, all the things it claims basedbart of doing. It has to be a lame attempt at a joke. Propably just wants some visibility for his new site that actually tells you the thruth cause you can't figure it out yourself. I too need people to tell me what to think so I don't have to take personal responsibility for myself. He's clearly friendly. But a shill or a kike? that's the real question. Or maybe from the temple of set?

0
31

[–] 6991948? 0 points 31 points (+31|-0) ago 

The artificially high upvote count for something like this on Voat signals a shill.

0
14

[–] Anoxim 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

If it's satire than put it in v/funny. boom. problem solved.

2
178

[–] HomerChimpson 2 points 178 points (+180|-2) ago  (edited ago)

This is going the be another artificially vote inflated post isn't it.

Edit. This post had 20 upvotes when I wrote this.

0
69

[–] ratsmack 0 points 69 points (+69|-0) ago 

You seem to be correct.

1
35

[–] HomerChimpson 1 points 35 points (+36|-1) ago 

Well the guy should feel like an idiot. It is always so blatantly obvious.

0
8

[–] Plucc 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I left Reddit to avoid all this bullshit, and this is the first thing I see? Is nowhere safe from CTR?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
6

[–] dallasmuseum 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

What if instead of being a bot, its brigading from some tumblr or SRS group?

1
28

[–] gangrel 1 points 28 points (+29|-1) ago 

They are making it so obvious. They already have their echo chamber on reddit, can't they just leave us have our own discussion here.

1
13

[–] maxoverdrive 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

That's because they're faggots, and faggots just can't mind their own business and shut the fuck up. Such behavior is utterly beyond their ass-fucking comprehension....

1
5

[–] tribblepuncher 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.

2
17

[–] Titus-of-Voat 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

As of this comment 185 up votes in 2.1 hours. No way this post gets those up votes before the lastest /r/The_Donald/ blowup. That seems to be the trigger for all these idiots coming over here with this bullshit.

1
9

[–] PerplexedPirate 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

But The_Donald loves Breitbart, if anything they would downvoat this post.

4
13

[–] awshidahak 4 points 13 points (+17|-4) ago 

Voat count went up when I clicked down, so yeah, this looks like one of those bot upvoats with two accounts for every downvoat type deals. Would clicking report spam be inappropriate?

0
8

[–] lorlipone 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I tried with the last obvious voat manipulation post I saw. The response I got was that it was obviously "Fucky" but not "Spam."

Was disappoint.

0
8

[–] HomerChimpson 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

From what i can tell, it won't help.

0
4

[–] 6992005? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"Report spam" literally just sends a message to the moderators (in this case, just @flyawayhigh, because guiness2 is a "Designer {only has access to the style sheet, can't delete posts or comments} and system is basically just a way to both "mark which subverses are the 'default' ones" and "fill up the 'Owner'/'Level 1' spot on their mod teams so that the admins still have complete control if they need to step in") alerting them to a comment/post that could potentially be spam.

The moderators in question still have to get on Voat, check out their inbox, find the spam reports, and check to see if the post/comment is actually spam or actually breaks the subverse's rules.

0
101

[–] ratsmack 0 points 101 points (+101|-0) ago 

mediabiasfactcheck.com

I see, all you have to do is put "fact check" in your URL and suddenly you become an unbiased fact checker... Mr. 20 minute account.

0
8

[–] chags 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

B-but... They checked the facts. They wouldn't lie, would they?

0
3

[–] TAThatBoomerang 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
75

[–] enormousatom 0 points 75 points (+75|-0) ago 

They'll eventually figure out that money spent shilling on voat is almost as wasteful as shilling on 4chan.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Ifaptocomments 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

money spent shilling on any chan just drives users to a different chan/board. If they do that to voat we would have to make another voat replacement or come up with some way of not letting them control the discussion (preferably not banning though).

do you still need a minimum amount of comment KArma to submit? We should bring that back

11
-10

1
54

[–] strategema 1 points 54 points (+55|-1) ago 

Sweet post bro. Non click bait title, minimal to no use of loaded words, long established account. This definitely checks out as fact. Can you recommend some good news sites?

1
11

[–] Daeshaniqua 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

cnn.com

0
54

[–] Enterstellar 0 points 54 points (+54|-0) ago 

Not buying it. sorry bro.

0
1

[–] opccrude 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Sorry Bottom boys. err I meant sorry bot.

0
39

[–] LilBrattyMkr 0 points 39 points (+39|-0) ago 

That's hilarious. From the same site:

CNN - LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation.

Generally trustworthy CNN - Thanks for that laugh today.

0
9

[–] Titus-of-Voat 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Washington Post gets the same rating.

6
-4

0
34

[–] Salicaz 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

Kek

load more comments ▼ (162 remaining)