2
35

[–] piratse 2 points 35 points (+37|-2) ago 

And he didn't record this, take screen caps, or live stream on youtube, periscope, ustream, twitch etc etc etc? Sorry, this isn't proof.

5
28

[–] Ah_Pook 5 points 28 points (+33|-5) ago 

You don't think that RANDOM CAPITALIZATION is enough to SWAY OPINION about HOW the BOT is FINANCING the RECOUNTS? SURELY that's all THE proof you NEED.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] NOTJIMJIM_404 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

ye it looks like the old man is panicking so he starts shutting everything down but it looks like its too late, two thing can happen now he can distract everyone and make us forget by making certain laws pass or clamp down on everyone and start putting people in re-education camps.

0
0

[–] vacvape 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Soros.exe has stopped working. Abort, retry?

[–] [deleted] 5 points 12 points (+17|-5) ago 

[Deleted]

2
3

[–] Gorillion 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Will always default back to the group identity, no matter how far they stray from the bosom while times are good.

You don't even have to damn them for it. Just keep it in mind, always. Do a deal with one, you're ultimately doing a deal with the group. I bet there are a lot of Stein voters currently regretting the deal they made on election day, or are mistaken in thinking she's doing this recount for them.

0
0

[–] thetruthoftensux 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Sounds like almost all racial social structures. I don't give a damn about Jews, or any of the others people rail about. On the outside, it seems like they figured out long ago how to win the game so they stay on top of it. People that scream the loudest typically are the ones who refuse to play the game as it is and thus always lose (and stay at the bottom of the ladder).

If you don't have your "tribe" to fall back on if times get tough, what do you really have?

1
2

[–] Greg_Punzo 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

First she says how having hillary will be a disaster because of WWIII and now she wants a recount to try and put her in office.

0
1

[–] goblin_ghost 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It's the perfect fucking hook. I haven't checked yet, but I can almost guarantee that Stein started upping the Don right after he started warning of election theft, because Hillary figured out that there would he too much scrutiny for her to steal it directly. She then turned to Stein to set this plan in motion- Stein would misdirect by supporting Trump (which was an odd thing for someone on the ballot to do), Hillary would concede on election night, release reports that she was taking it waaayyyy harder than she should have (because the cunt probably couldn't keep the poker face required to sell her concession knowing that this plan was in place), and then after things calmed down, Stein would push for the recount (since Hillary had already conceded and couldn't, giving the illusion that Hilldawg was innocent in the matter), and then open up a reason for Hillary to take back her concession and steal the presidency.

2
-2

[–] Saufsoldat 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Really? When did she say she wants to put Hillary in office?

0
9

[–] wgtt911 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I guess people don't recall how close the election was in 2000... recounted for a month and Bush still won... waste of "someone's money".. but then soros has a lot of money...

0
8

[–] PizzagateConspiracy 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Jill Stein was more critical of Clinton than Johnson was... Why would she be conspiring with her?

0
3

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Who else can this help and how?

1
2

[–] Shekelstein6M 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

This is what we've been trying to tell you here on voat for months now. You can't trust a jew.

7
0

[–] LargePepperoni 7 points 0 points (+7|-7) ago 

Dude, take that racist bullshit somewhere else. It reflects poorly on the entire sub and will be used to discredit all of us.

0
0

[–] revofire 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

All of the politicians act out personalities for you to see, and yes... even Trump. Stein is obviously trash, she'll go with the money and the success... Hillary can offer that.

0
8

[–] farstar 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Why would jill stein be doing this, and not hillary? Surely contesting election counts herself is not past her? It doesn't quite add up to me

0
11

[–] Norm85 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Old proverb says

People in glass houses should not throw stones. Better to pay someone to throw stones for you.

0
10

[–] pewpewpewmoon 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Hillary and friends called out Trump for not saying he wouldn't contest the vote. In order to save face, someone else needs to do so.

0
5

[–] Gorillion 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Yeah, H did an amazing job of fucking herself over after the election by smacking talking "the loser" before the election.

0
4

[–] Dr_Moonman_III 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The strategy is called using a "cat's paw".

0
2

[–] farstar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I understand the strategy, but I don't quite think that this is something that jill stein would do. There could be technical reasons why the donations are coming in at a set rate. what about other donations besides the 160k that hillary's group is supposed to be adding, shouldn't it be 160k + other donations, that would add some variability in the donation count.

0
3

[–] hairless_rock_ape 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Because if Hillary was insisting on a recount, it would look like she's not respecting the results of a democratic election.

0
0

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Okay but what do the Greens get out of it?

0
6

[–] CrudOMatic 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The white genocide train needs to keep rolling - so of course they're going to tell us Russia hacked the vote in MI, where there is no electronic voting, and in PA where the machines have no way to be hacked.

Russia is just that clever. That's why they have to be nuked - so more white people are killed in yet another world war because they're just big meanies and doo-doo heads.

0
6

[–] KittenCat 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I haven't looked into it a ton, I just found out about this recount thing a few hours ago. But why is Jill Stein the one talking about recounts when she herself said that Trump was way better than Hillary?

0
12

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

"That is what is creating this right wing extremism. A vote for Hillary Clinton isn't going to fix it...

It is now Hillary Clinton that wants to start an air war with Russia over Syria by calling for a no fly zone.

We have 2000 nuclear missiles on hairtrigger alert. They are saying we are closer to a nuclear war than we have ever been.

Under Hillary Clinton, we could slide into nuclear war very quickly from her declared policy in Syria.

I sure won't sleep well at night if Donald Trump is elected, but I sure won't sleep well at night if Hillary Clinton elected. We have another choice other than these two candidates who are both promoting lethal policies.*

On the issue of war and nuclear weapons, it is actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Trump who does not want to go to war with Russia.

He wants to seek modes of working together, which is the route that we need to follow not to go into confrontation and nuclear war with Russia."

-Dr. Jill Stein, M.D. - C-SPAN October 11, 2016 (emphasis mine)

And now she wants a recount FOR Hillary? This is INCREDIBLY fishy...

0
3

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

A recount in Michigan can't change the election: the other two states are extremely unlikely to come out for Hillary. And as you pointed out Stein was never a big Hillary fan. So assuming she's not actually trying to reverse the results of the election what else will a recount accomplish? Is it a distraction? Is she trying to force a legal precedent?

load more comments ▼ (18 remaining)