You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

15
-10

[–] Titus-of-Voat 15 points -10 points (+5|-15) ago 

Private company they can do what they want.

1
21

[–] Shekelstein6M 1 points 21 points (+22|-1) ago 

Not really. This is racial discrimination. If a bakery can't refuse to bake cakes to certain individuals then a tech company can't selectively enforce rules based on race.

Also, during the election they helped Hillary, which could be seen as a donation to her campaign. Because they failed to disclose this they violated FEC and FCC laws. Anyway we'll see what congress has to say about this in the future. From what I've been hearing Twitter might be in trouble.

0
6

[–] NomeSayin 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You make a good point. These people should hire some big gun lawyers and fuck Twitter over good. The stock price needs to crater.

0
7

[–] auto_turret 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

My local coney is not free to refuse service identity serving blacks, Twitter should not be free to not serve identity servicing whites. Private company argument., my ass.

0
2

[–] UsedToCuck 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What is wrong with you Do you work for twitter