This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DickHertz ago
Nor can it advance by losing elections so I have to strongly disagree that the best outcome for the democrats is losing the election for the Whitehouse under any circumstances. When you get two years of Senate control plus the Whitehouse plus the ability to make a huge and lasting change in the judiciary that's not nothing.
[–] Kurplow 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
You appear to be under the assumption the Senate turns blue tomorrow. I don't expect it to, but 538 is giving odds very close to a coin flip.
Let me restructure my position: If the dems don't take the Senate, they would be better off (in the long term) to spend the 2016-2020 term building resistance at the state level, and in Congress--because if they don't, when they eventually do lose the White House, they will have less of a hold on power even than they will if they lose now--and without the Senate they won't have accomplished anything anyway. It's not hard to imagine what the GOP would do in 2020 with the White House and the Senate (you're already imagining the democrats doing it)--only, the GOP would have the majority of State Legislatures and gubernatorial seats and perhaps multiple open Supreme Court seats.
I still have a lingering sense that there is nothing the dems could accomplish in those two years that would truly make it any harder for GOPers to reassert control post 2020 (because of how many other institutions they control) if the dems allow their power base to corrode further, even if they do take the senate, but I'll cede the ground.
[–] DickHertz ago
Why is winning the Whitehouse mutually exclusive with those other activities? Even if the Senate does not turn blue tomorrow holding the Whitehouse maintains status-quo of do nothing and preserves Obama initiatives. Were the republicans to hold both houses and the Whitehouse they could do real damage to Democratic positions left unchecked.
The Senate need not actually turn blue - purple gets it as well since VP is blue. As far as multiple Supreme Court seats Justices can resign at any time including the first two years of Hillary's term and sometimes they do make strategic resignations but of course if dems don't take Senate it's a moot point.
What makes you think GOP will win in 2020 against incumbent? Obama was very unpopular and still got two terms. This year's Republican campaign was a shit show resulting in a nominee that nobody established in the party wants anything to do with. If they don't get their shit together they'll likely go down again.