You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
-1

[–] Crashmarik [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Now you are arguing with your own prior statements. I didn't make that quote you did. No wonder it's hard for me to get a word in edgewise.

Do yourself a favor and come back when you know what it is you are trying to defend. Here's a hint ask yourself just why that picture obviously bothers you so much.

1
-1

[–] beren 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not arguing with my previous statement. I don't have the right to levy a taxagainst anyone else and threw them in the cage if they don't pay me. That is the non-aggression principle.

I can ask for money, but that doesn't mean anybody has to pay me. And if I use Force against them that is immoral.

1
-1

[–] Crashmarik [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Liar

The EXACT same way we do now. How do you not understand that? You just WANT it to not be true so you can say it won't work, but ignoring logic isn't an argument . Or are you just asserting that people will gleefully agree to give up significant portions of their wealth without coercion or that they will agree what constitutes and does not constitute justification for the use of force.

The only person making unsupported assertions here is you, The sooner you understand that the sooner you will be on the road to becoming an adult.