You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

As a general rule the ones that came illegally can't even vote. As for Hispanic conservatism... what do you mean? Social conservatism? Their personal behavior? Well, Hispanics have higher crime rates, abortion rates, and illegitimacy rates than whites. They have lower divorce and drug use rates though. That last one seems to make them less Libertarian come to think of it...

What they most certainly are not is fiscal conservatives. They get a disproportionate amount of free shit and that's why they vote Democrat.

Of course there are also variations between groups. Florida Cubans vote much more Republican than Southwest Mexicans.

In any event Libertarians can't even get small government minded whites to vote for them. Good luck with Pedro.

0
2

[–] Cant_Call_It 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

As for Hispanic conservatism... what do you mean? Social conservatism? Their personal behavior?

As in we seem to be on the same page on most things and I consider myself somewhere between conservative and libertarian if I were to give myself a label. Again, this is just my experience and my family/friends combined with my personality probably skews the type of person I end up getting to know.

Example: I don't really have any close/personal friends that are black. It's not that I actively avoid them (except for the neighborhoods. I avoid those.) but we just don't really mesh most of the time. Hispanics are hit or miss almost or just just as much as white people for me.

Anyway, long story short, I was just curious about the rundown.

Edit:

As a general rule the ones that came illegally can't even vote.

I kinda went on my own train of thought and responded to what I was thinking about if that makes sense. I guess it really didn't apply to what you were saying.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You seem to be disagreeing without actually disagreeing and even agreeing by implication. Or maybe you're a sophist or don't understand the concept of proportionality. Or maybe we don't understand each other?

Suffice it to say that if one group is 60-70% of the population and gets a third of the welfare outlays and another is in the 10-15% range but also gets a third it is not the 60-70% group that is disproportionately receiving welfare. Indeed, racially speaking, this amounts to a massive wealth transfer from whites to Hispanics.