0
22

[–] philomath 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Just thinking ahead....trump could pull that card out in the debates, and it would be beautiful.

when hilldog attacks him as racist for it, he can pull out the fact that her husband promised the same thing, but that he'd be effective enough to implement it. She'll either have to pivot there and concede the point or pull up his racist comments about Mexicans being rapists, which opens up the door for trump to talk about her husband being a rapist - a land mine she can't get close to.

0
8

[–] Dingolicious 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Hillary at a debate? Good luck getting her to agree to one!

1
6

[–] p0ssum 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

You do realize that these are already scheduled and she's already agreed?

0
4

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"Well my opponent is content to live in the past, but the first woman president understands that you need to be able to adapt to the times!"

*standing ovation, CNN anchors cry*

0
0

[–] philomath 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Next news cycle, "Donald Trump continues to be racist and hate women! Glorious Hillary once again stoicly rises above the fray."

0
8

[–] 8Hz_WAN_IP 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Leftist ideology only works if you have a short memory.

1
7

[–] Joe_McCarthy 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

It was right around that time when Bill Clinton wanted to reduce legal immigration. The idea got deep sixed by Jews, Catholics, Mexicans, and capitalists.

0
0

[–] Eualos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Legal fully vetted immigration is usually good for the US economically, so this makes sense.

0
0

[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Mostly it was good for Mexicans to keep bringing their families in and good for Catholics to increase the number of Catholics and thus put butts in their churches. It was also good for certain business owners to acquire cheaper labor. One might even argue it was 'good for the economy' - whatever that means. But man and state are about more than economics. Immigration threatens the social cohesion and political stability of the country and is thus ultimately a threat to national security.

0
6

[–] rspix000 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Bill Clinton said:

All Americans, not only in the States most heavily affected but in every place in this country, are rightly disturbed by the large numbers of illegal aliens entering our country. The jobs they hold might otherwise be held by citizens or legal immigrants. The public service they use impose burdens on our taxpayers. That's why our administration has moved aggressively to secure our borders more by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before, by cracking down on illegal hiring, by barring welfare benefits to illegal aliens. In the budget I will present to you, we will try to do more to speed the deportation of illegal aliens who are arrested for crimes, to better identify illegal aliens in the workplace as recommended by the commission headed by former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan. We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it.

Trump says he's going to deport 14 Million and build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. This isn't "exactly verbatim", which BTW is the bestest mostest way of saying the same thing twice.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] piratse 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

His point is that mirroring sentiment isn't "exactly" or "verbatim".

0
2

[–] newoldwave 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The left wing media have been propagandizing for some time now. They used to deny it, but it's too obvious now.

[–] [deleted] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] newoldwave 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The right media are always pointing out the shit the left is up to but is not given to slanting the story or outright lies.

0
2

[–] twitch1982 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Strom Thurman runs on pro-segrigation platform and wins. Trump says exact same thing and gets called racist!

0
0

[–] quakerbaker 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You do know Strom Thurman is a known racist who is/was vilified for his positions, right? No one thinks he's a good guy

0
0

[–] twitch1982 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Now. My point was public opinion changes. The man still won elections for another 30 years or so.

0
1

[–] Gman992 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Democrats can't be racist. It's a proven fact. Black people can't be racist. It's a proven fact. Hispanic people can't be racist. It's a proven fact. Only whites and Asians can be racist. It's a proven fact.

4
1

[–] p0ssum 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

Well Bill didn't say all that stuff about rapists and murderers. I think that might be part of the reason this is viewed so differently, but hey, what do I know?

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)