[–] [deleted] 3 points 13 points (+16|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

21
-14

16
10

[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 16 points 10 points (+26|-16) ago 

How ironic history will remember him for being a refugee fleeing sweden on rape charges.

0
54

[–] due 0 points 54 points (+54|-0) ago 

Those rape charges were so unbelievable. It’s too much like a simple attempt at character assassination. Don’t even bring this shit up. It just makes plebs keep believing that shit.

2
19

[–] novictim 2 points 19 points (+21|-2) ago 

Exactly! Assange had consensual sex. Regretting the sex later, realizing that Assange is sleeping around does not constitute "Rape" by any stretch of the imagination. You would think that having literally thousands of your own citizens raped for real by Muslim "refugees" would have clarified what real rape is all about.

Sweden has truly cucked itself.

0
12

[–] 0x4F 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

That cunt was a plant, I'm convinced of it. BTW, whatever became of that bullshit case where a woman accused Linus Torvalds?

1
2

[–] SecularPenguinist 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

And we all know how serious Sweden is about preventing rape.

1
5

[–] 0x4F 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

I'm guessing you mean Hillary shills/CTR? I don't know if he mentioned Voat specifically although maybe he lurks here because he's a fan of alternative media and online social gatherings. If he did then, hey, we're famous now :)

0
4

[–] sec 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The shills are particularly bad over at 4chan.

0
2

[–] jinbnters 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yep, and getting worse on 8chan too. But on boards like /pol/ at least its kind of obvious cause its usually so low quality it can be spotted

0
1

[–] dingomeat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Be careful of the ones who mix lies in with truth.

0
4

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

When people are awake the shilling makes no difference. Nothing they say matters. Why they lose. And continue to lose. Forever. Until people fall asleep again.

2
3

[–] this_was_available 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Look, I keep repeating this over and over again because apparently it's necessary, but if Assange were an actual threat to governments, he wouldn't be alive anymore.

  • Michael Hastings was saying things that actually upset the US government, and his car crashed into a tree at full speed and exploded.
  • JFK got shot.

I'm sure others have been neutralized too, but those two are pretty good examples.

It's not only that he would have been killed already, but you have to wonder why the government-controlled mainstream media ever told us about Assange in the first place, if he was actually saying things governments didn't want us to hear?

If governments didn't want us to hear what Assange has to say, why would the MSM interview him every now and then over the years?

The Sweden rape thing was a farce, but if necessary, it could serve as a handy excuse for extraditing him to Sweden, and from there to Guantanamo.

The bunch of psychopaths running Ecuador don't actually give a fuck about Assange's well-being, and if the US wanted him, Ecuador would not be able to protect him, or could easily be bribed to hand him over. This has applied from the beginning.

The point here is that Assange is clearly a propaganda tool, which means his "leaks" are propaganda too! This is not rocket science!

In other words, Assange hasn't made "The Truth" loud and clear. He's just done his job to create and advance The Killary Narrative. Again, if Killary was the big bad wolf they've made her out to be, why would she let Assange live and kill a few random no-names instead?

The shills on Voat are mostly shouting about Zionists/Kikes/Jews/Niggers and Killary this and DNC that, and oh noes look at those savage Muslim animals again! -It's all a fucking bullshit circus to distract you from what really matters, which is understanding that we should not have rulers:

EDIT:

Someone responded with a fake quote, changing what I said in the end to: "understanding that we should not have rulers: Niggers, Jews and other undesirables in Western Countries".

Does he sincerely want us to think he sees "undesirables in Western countries" as a bigger problem than all of mankind being enslaved by rulers?

Or did he just not bother watching any of the videos?

0
2

[–] pitenius 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The shills on Voat are mostly shouting about Zionists/Kikes/Jews/Niggers and Killary this and DNC that, and oh noes look at those savage Muslim animals again! -It's all a fucking bullshit circus to distract you from what really matters, which is understanding that we should not have rulers:

Jeez, dude. You nailed what I find distressing about Voat. Also, these sorts bring a bad energy. Ideally, the point of downvoating is to suppress trollin', but the downvoats seem to just be butthurt replies to the fight over internet points. I'm still parsing the "reddit-mode" of interaction, but it seems that the medium dictates the community.

As to your major point, maybe Assange got lucky? Maybe it was the insurance file? At the same time, even some people very close to wikileaks have noted that not everything gets promoted with equal interest. What better way to window dress dissent than by organizing the opposition? (Tried and true conspirator ploy, there.)

As to your edit: I think you triggered a well-poisoner. Your post was too on point, so someone had to distract it back to hate speech and wharrgarbl.

0
2

[–] this_was_available 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Jeez, dude. You nailed what I find distressing about Voat. Also, these sorts bring a bad energy.

Yeah, Voat has basically been reduced to a barrage of Divide & Conquer propaganda. The front page is full of it every day, all fucking day.

I'm still here because apparently at least some human beings can see my posts.

the point of downvoating is to suppress trollin', but the downvoats seem to just be butthurt replies to the fight over internet points

Downvoats are used quite effectively to "bury" and discredit truth-telling. People see a comment at several minus points, and they disregard it as nonsense, etc.

As to your major point, maybe Assange got lucky? Maybe it was the insurance file?

How would "luck" explain anything about what I brought up? As for the insurance file, I guess you mean the "dead man's switch" thing where lots of "sensitive" documents would be released if Assange were killed?

But that just goes back to the fact that if Assange were a real threat to governments, they'd work very hard to neutralize him. So if he had a "dead man's switch", then they'd work very hard to neutralize that too. Don't you think the CIA could find and kill the people involved in it? Then they'd be free to kill Assange too.

Besides, there are lots of ways they could make Assange go away, and again, they made Assange appear in the first place. Imagine some random leaker guy starting out his operation.

He'd just set up a website with some leaked documents, and wait for people to come see it? No? Well, he'd work hard to "market" his leaks etc, so that they would matter?

How many years would it take for enough people to see them, to constitute a notable phenomenon? What would governments do at that point? Why they would move to neutralize the fuck out of the guy.

some people very close to wikileaks have noted that not everything gets promoted with equal interest

Oh? Well, I don't know how to interpret that.

As to your edit: I think you triggered a well-poisoner. Your post was too on point, so someone had to distract it back to hate speech and wharrgarbl.

Of course :) It's happened a lot. The most concentrated attack I got was in response to my post about Trump here: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/1055122 .. but that post got to the top of AskVoat, before getting buried by the shills.

3
-3

[–] fr33europe 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

-It's all a fucking bullshit circus to distract you from what really matters, which is understanding that we should not have rulers: Niggers, Jews and other undesirables in Western Countries.

The reason why Assange is allowed to live because he's not an overt white power Jew hating Nationalist. He's still a star struck leftie.

0
1

[–] AOU 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

14 shills got triggered by this post.

2
1

[–] 8_billion_eaters 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

I say let the shills post. They earn a few bucks from the democrats or BLM and they show the stupidity of their agenda. With every post, more and more cash leaves their coffers.

You gotta figure by now, the Clinton Foundation and Soros know the whole world is on them like white on rice. Those scumbags can't even buy a cigar anymore.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)