You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] Ravinous 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Except the constitution.

He want's to expand Libel to make it easier to accuse it with little argument, thus limiting the 1st amendment and freedom to criticize public figures. He wants to expand the NSA's powers despite the violations of the 4th and 5th. He is pro torture, a violation of the 6th . His expansion of the NSA and various other overreaches of office are a clear violation of the Articles and 10th.

So no, he's not a candidate of Law and Order because he can't support the fundamental ideology of the nation. Sadly none of the candidates do this.

0
2

[–] goatsandbros [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Could you link to some sources? It would help the discussion.

0
2

[–] Ravinous 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] AmaleksHairyAss 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

none of the candidates do this.

What about Stein?

0
0

[–] Ravinous 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Her Veep has much to be desired and she still a bit to Federal Power for me. Probably will vote for her as she is the best out of the 4, but sadly the Green Party, like all third parties doesn't stand much of a chance. Ironically this is the best year for the libertarian party because both D and R candidates are polling so low, but Garry is pro TPP and is more a pro corporatism libertarian than a constitutional state power libertarian. Woooo for complex nuances.