You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
9

[–] SpaceLizard 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It's not silly. You don't need to be prosecuted to lose access to classified material. When obtaining or holding a security clearance you have to go through security reviews, where small things like being in debt can cause you to fail. What Clinton has done should cause her to lose her clearance.

0
0

[–] rulloff_in_a_jar ago 

The head of Naval security had this happen. So there is precedent.

5
-4

[–] AlphaWookie 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago 

That prohibition does not apply to the nominee of either major political party and for good reason. Learn to deal with it. Also fuck you for making me have to defend Hillary because you are ignorant and acting as a hack.

0
4

[–] SpaceLizard 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I would love to see some evidence that a presidential candidate can get waived, or does not need to go through a security review to gain access to classified material. I'll wait.

0
1

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Sounds like a load of bullshit. Proof?