You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
0

[–] nomenimion 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

This is silly. You either prosecute her, or you don't.

0
9

[–] SpaceLizard 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It's not silly. You don't need to be prosecuted to lose access to classified material. When obtaining or holding a security clearance you have to go through security reviews, where small things like being in debt can cause you to fail. What Clinton has done should cause her to lose her clearance.

0
0

[–] rulloff_in_a_jar ago 

The head of Naval security had this happen. So there is precedent.

5
-4

[–] AlphaWookie 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago 

That prohibition does not apply to the nominee of either major political party and for good reason. Learn to deal with it. Also fuck you for making me have to defend Hillary because you are ignorant and acting as a hack.

1
9

[–] EarthGleaner 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Exactly. Ryan is basically saying, " Ok, we will let all of your past crimes slide, but you can't do it again.."

Which in itself is an admission of her guilt!