You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
15

[–] refugee610 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Sounds sensible seeing as she's proven that she can't be trusted to keep it safe.

4
-1

[–] AlphaWookie 4 points -1 points (+3|-4) ago 

That is not how the statutes are written. You have to ignore the bulk of history post WWII to come to that conclusion.

0
7

[–] refugee610 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

She ain't president yet so there's no reason for her to be given any insight into classified material. If she were still Sec. of State she'd have had her clearance administratively removed (as the FBI director said) but since she's not technically in government right now there wasn't anything they could do to her - that doesn't mean she needs to be read in.