This is a subverse designed to encourage adult discussion spanning the entirety of the political spectrum. All are welcome, from Libertarians to Authoritarians, Democrats to Republicans, An Caps to Anarchists, Socialists to Fascists to Communists, Green, Blue, Black, White, Purple with Yellow Polka dots, whatever color, persuasion, or affiliation, this is a place for you to post your thoughts, articles, and engage in discussion meant to foster understanding.
Politics is best when we try to avoid personal attacks, limits on discussion, censorship, trolling, shilling, racism, homophobia, antisemitism, or any other forms of bigotry and malfeasance.
Election 2020 Politics Sticky
Politics 2017 Christmas Theme sticky
Nov 2016 sticky on new CSS
This subverse belongs to the community of users. Users are invited to post meta-threads about v/politics and I will gladly sticky them. @flyawayhigh
Use the "Report Spam" link to report spam and someone will review the report. J-mods have the ability to remove duplicate noncommercial spam.
v/politics is for all politics.
v/uspolitics is for US politics only.
v/worldpolitics is for international or non-US politics.
v/politicalnews is dedicated to virtually censor-free politics and news
v/news is for news around the world.
v/usnews is for domestic news only.
Sort: Top
[–] AlphaWookie 0 points 21 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago
See leftist this is why there can never be any compromise on gun rights, the slippery slope is all to real.
[–] Owlchemy 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
Absolutely right! Each new gun law is touted as the end game, when we all know, per history, it is only the beginning. 1968 was supposed to fix it all. Anyone care to look at California, as an example, today.
[–] Womb_Raider 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
1968 = automatic rifles ban?
[–] HAPPYBEN 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
It's like these retards want a civil war.
[–] Exit 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Look at this guy. Greasy fucking hair acne ridden face
[–] ZeroFuggzGiven 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
And while he's at it he should shut down shit sites like Vox. Take the second amendment and he may as well take the first.
[–] voNIKONov 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
At risk of judging a book by its cover, who the fuck could take this guy seriously? He looks like someone that would enjoy being a victim. Fuck.. Why are we taking the pussies' word for things?
[–] CrazyInAnInsaneWorld 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
They said the same thing about the SJW's during the 90's, and now look at how seriously they are taken by College Administration. So seriously that they will railroad any guy they point the finger at, just to get the SocJus crew off their backs.
[–] Aboresh 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Aboresh: Vox Writer should eat a bag of dicks.
[–] iamjanesleftnipple 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Sure, so long as that includes everyone in the military, the police force, and the public and private body guards for all politicians (including the president).
Oh, and the criminals, too. Gotta make sure they know it's against the law too.
[–] brucethemoose ago (edited ago)
Let's just put how wrong that would be aside for a second.
The president can't do that. He has to say this before entering office:
So until Congress amends the Constitution or the President starts a coup, tough shit.