You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]pizzaboss0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]pizzaboss[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
[They did not 'confess' anything until they were in Morocco where he tortured them into making the claims against the father. They admitted to lying because Abraham made them after the police had investigated some of their claims ]
You saying 1. Abe took them, abused them mentally, physically, and giving them both extremely sexual injuries.
And 2. That this happen AFTER the police investigated some of their claims.
So you are saying they made claims against the father twice and then imediately after the second claim they retracted after hearing about wardrobe.
Unless you are saying the first claims are the claims that Abe beat about AFTER the police investigated the claims. Either way your story seems p shakey. Anything else to add to it? Maybe theres an important comma or two missing from your statement so it makes more since.
The only thing that is shaky is your insistence on seeing only what you want to see regardless of what the evidence proves. The peers of the doctor did not agree with her findings when it went up for review. The anal injuries were not anything like the doctor had made them out to be in both her first and second examination and were most likely caused by constipation or the enema which the mother had given them for it. The constipation likely having been caused by Abraham's forcing a change of diet onto the children.
Or perhaps it was caused due to neglecting to ensure the children ate or drank enough, because the school were concerned about their well-being after finding them eating food from a bin at school because they were so hungry. Or how about the time the social services were called by a neighbor because the mother locked them out on the balcony in their nightwear for hours with no food or drink.
So are you saying that the cuts and bruises on the children were caused by the father 3 months ago and that neither the mother nor Abraham saw them in all that time?
[+]pizzaboss0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]pizzaboss[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
No i suspect the cuts and bruises occured after they were taken into custody with the police. Please continue your campaign in this new post https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/1541891
view the rest of the comments →
[–] pizzaboss [S] ago (edited ago)
[They did not 'confess' anything until they were in Morocco where he tortured them into making the claims against the father. They admitted to lying because Abraham made them after the police had investigated some of their claims ] You saying 1. Abe took them, abused them mentally, physically, and giving them both extremely sexual injuries. And 2. That this happen AFTER the police investigated some of their claims. So you are saying they made claims against the father twice and then imediately after the second claim they retracted after hearing about wardrobe. Unless you are saying the first claims are the claims that Abe beat about AFTER the police investigated the claims. Either way your story seems p shakey. Anything else to add to it? Maybe theres an important comma or two missing from your statement so it makes more since.
[–] norobotono ago
The only thing that is shaky is your insistence on seeing only what you want to see regardless of what the evidence proves. The peers of the doctor did not agree with her findings when it went up for review. The anal injuries were not anything like the doctor had made them out to be in both her first and second examination and were most likely caused by constipation or the enema which the mother had given them for it. The constipation likely having been caused by Abraham's forcing a change of diet onto the children.
Or perhaps it was caused due to neglecting to ensure the children ate or drank enough, because the school were concerned about their well-being after finding them eating food from a bin at school because they were so hungry. Or how about the time the social services were called by a neighbor because the mother locked them out on the balcony in their nightwear for hours with no food or drink.
So are you saying that the cuts and bruises on the children were caused by the father 3 months ago and that neither the mother nor Abraham saw them in all that time?
[–] pizzaboss [S] ago (edited ago)
No i suspect the cuts and bruises occured after they were taken into custody with the police. Please continue your campaign in this new post https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/1541891