9 months ago I asked argosciv very nicely to explain his words to me. I explained to him that his words were ambiguous and by and large meaningless. I tried to ask specific questions in order to make things easier on him.
There wasn't even an ounce of effort on his part to clarify.
Here's a pizzagatewhatever post defining words for us in an attempt to befuddle the unwary and get them to go along with his mind gymnastics about a place called Racine, Wisconsin. Just scroll over it quick. He gives you the wikipedia link for Wisconsin, and quotes something completely irrelevant. Then Nicaragua. Then Hurricane names. He puts in bold the words "Joseph and Mary".
In submission 2, he STILL won't touch directly on Racine, ostensibly the whole point of both of these submissions.
Links to wikipedia for Slavery in the US, Cuban revolution, Nicaraguan revolution, mentions of Kurt Cobain, Jimmy Hoffa, Emerson Electric, Queen Victoria, 1905 Russian Revolution...
And he who he pings is rather telling given the list of users attacking the mods recently.
Lindbergh kidnapping. Really. Just list out all kinds of events without ANYTHING but a wikipedia excerpt and link.
Not Another Teen Movie Jaime PRESSLY plays Priscilla in the Movie. In real life Priscilla was the Wife of Elvis PRESLEY Another Tin In IIDK.
WOW. SO AMAZING.
I was discussing the Vegas shooting and the broader connections, with a very close friend... he, in jest, said, "What happens in vegas, stays in vegas"
my friend is very much like me and has a different way of having obtained similar knowledge(I will reveal no more), he is not always sure why he says what he says but he has proven vital at times & always delivers abstractly.
Un. Fucking. Real.
So let me connect the dots of this piece of shit submission for you all.
Vegas shooting(live coverage thread) - comment RE: Not Another Teen Movie -> "Jaime PRESSLY plays Priscilla in the Movie" -> "Priscilla was the Wife of Elvis PRESLEY" -> "I was discussing the Vegas shooting and the broader connections, with a very close friend... he, in jest, said, "What happens in vegas, stays in vegas"" -> Retard friend mentions "Shep" -> "On October 3, 1945, Elvis Presley sang "Old Shep" at age ten for his first public performance" -> "My friend, also, in conversation mentioned, "Ford", again I forget why, sorry." -> Wikipedia bullshit on HENRY FORD -> Wikipedia bullshit on WILLIAM FORD -> "Again, no word of a lie, my friend and I had also briefly touched on the Irish potato famine..." -> OMG THEY MENTIONED POTATOES -> Something about Idaho, Utah or Wisconsin -> OH SHIT, ANOTHER QUESTION TO ANSWER, "Is there a relation to be found via "Ford", perhaps related to Chicago mafia, prohibition, Jimmy Hoffa, Ed Gein, Manson Family, etc?" -> Going back to Jaime Pressly, though... -> Sidenote: Las Vegas, Elvis Impersonators... weddings??? -> Vegas shooting.
That's ONE submission in his "series".
Here he is claiming anti-Satanist rhetoric HELPS Scientologists and even more nefarious parties. I asked him to prove his claim.
Not only did he not prove his claim, but he didn't prove any link at all between Satanists or scientologists. He claims it will take "pages" of research to respond to the simple request above.
I liked where he PMd me this:
as it makes you and that retarded judaeo-christian-cunt srayzie
... after I told him specifically NOT to do so, and to take his communication to the public forum. I can kind of see why @srayzie is unlikely to let up on him - I can kind of see why others might not take kindly to him, either.
Did he really just ping KKWR? Nutcase.
In my attempts to find something actually useful or good, I found that he used a reverse image search (Should be standard operating procedure here, is it not?) to debunk this. And other than that, he's been listing the faggots attacking mods over the Jem777 crap, and seems to be on the correct side there. It's only fair I look for and mention what good I did find.
I fail to see why this thing with almost no redeeming qualities and a great deal of qualities that are, at best, useless, is not treated like the fecal matter it is.
Doesn't he drink blood or some shit? With what PG has been researching, I can't see his justifications for that as anything but an attempt to shove the narrative back around the ritualistic drinking of blood that supposedly happens. Attempting to create a sacred cow by arguing that it's totally ok to drink blood.
I don't have the links to all of that, but I recall seeing him mention it specifically because he doesn't want everyone talking bad about people that drink blood. What the everloving fuck is that?
Mock the little parasitic faggot or don't, but I'm going to need a bit more in the way of justification before I turn this particular username into a sacred cow for myself. I saw the justification that we have more pressing enemies to fight, but I can and will fight everyone at the same time, and I'll win.
Vindi, you can run your mod team how you like, but if that's a sticking point for you, I'll make sure I rip the faggot to shreds every time he decides to drink his adrenochrome. I'm not terribly fond of the idea of curtailing comments by mods, but I haven't heard your justification for that.
If that is the path forward, the other mods can have their justice boners vicariously through my responses to argosciv, if they choose to continue being mods with such a limitation.
Just my .02, and it's about time argo had his very own submission that can be searched for on searchvoat anyway.
@srayzie @think- @EricKaliberhall @shizy