[–] ESOTERICshade 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Falcon:

Rule 3: Not clear what Chatham house is or how relates to post.


These links are administrators and board members affiliated with Welcome Trust. The rest of us understood it. The link itself is descriptive. It says what it is. "governance, board, governors, chathamhouse, academy, board."


Board of Directors https://wellcome.ac.uk/about-us/governance/board-governors

Wellcome Trust: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2284504

Chatham house https://www.chathamhouse.org/academy/board


Rule 3:

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

We don't think scrapping hours of a person's work is worth it for you to nitpick posts with this much research. This post refers to one of the tops of the food chain at the top of the pyramid. Down from there it spreads out and gets very tedious and complicated. Researchers must be allowed to follow the trails, research, for it to be fully understood. We used to be a crowd sources investigative sub. Now we are a sub that has to attempt to pass Falcon's almost impossible barriers. The diminished crowd speaks for how tired of this people are.


The OP is well known as not being a shill and should be given a little leeway. Its a small sub. If the mod is not familiar with the regular posters by now then the mod is not paying enough attention. Burning off this much time of a good researcher and regular poster is not OK.


You might argue other reasons for people having left and stopped bringing their investigations. This is my opinion and its the one I have.

@swordfish69 @kevdude @vindicator @think- @letsdothis1

[–] letsdothis1 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Esoteric, EVERYBODY knows about Chatham House..that right there is an indicator of the game we are playing.

Thanks for your fortitude by the way.

[–] ESOTERICshade 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Esoteric, EVERYBODY knows about Chatham House..that right there is an indicator of the game we are playing.

The links themselves were descriptive. They said what they were. This is indeed a game when the bar gets set this high.


Thanks for your fortitude by the way.

You are welcome but it won't last (my interest wanes daily for this place, like most people that used to be here) because even the rims are worn off this sub. The tires blew out a few hundred deleted posts ago.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I'm going to respond to you exactly once.

YOU ARE PERSONA NON GRATA. I don't give a SHIT about you, or what you say. In fact, the more you support something, the more likely I am to think the opposite, because every time you show up you are wrong.

[–] twistedmac11 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago  (edited ago)

And this is who we have moderating shit? Someone with the temperament of a toddler? Jesus, no wonder Voat is going to shit. You'd think @ESOTERICshade was the mod by the drastic difference in tone. Calm the fuck down.

If you can't deal with some pushback online without having a coronary, maybe you should consider other hobbies. Therapy, perhaps.

[–] Dungles 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If this comment was on Reddit, I'd post it to v/meanwhileonreddit. Been a big supporter of PV over the years @Kevdude @Mickgoestojail @Disappointed but looking through here you are hypocrites. @Puttitout what do you think of this and the way he's talking to users here to justify thread removals? This wasn't his sub he was given it by someone else after the users were here. Hows that different to v/chicago or v/canada? If I posted this in PV would I get a an SRS shill flair? No better than sanegoat calling everyone shills who criticises this sub.

[–] ESOTERICshade 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

I'm going to respond to you exactly once.

YOU ARE PERSONA NON GRATA. I don't give a SHIT about you, or what you say. In fact, the more you support something, the more likely I am to think the opposite, because every time you show up you are wrong.

As usual @letsdothis1 we are spinning our wheels in the pizzagatemods sub with nothing getting done and the insults flying. There is not much left of this sub to save anyway but at least we tried.

[–] dragonkiller 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

@Millennial_Falcon I need a job. How much does it pay be a mod here that laughs, snickers, and turns his head while he blocks posts that would help children who are being raped, and then when they finally get fucked to death have their organs ripped out? I mean, i'm afraid my conscience would bother me if I actually did it, even though I do need the money.


I need some tips though. How do you live with yourself? Do you take all the mirrors out of the house so that you don't have to look at your own face or what? If so how do you shave? Will I start to smell like sulphur, you know, like a demon or something? And if I start smelling like sulphur does that mean it will attract other demons because evil shit scares me. I have so many questions about being a baby raper enabler.....


When I see little kids will I feel guilty or does it finally get easier? Do you and @crensch split the money or how does it work? Is it tax free cash or do you work for some zionist media outfit that supplies gutless and heartless trolls to the internet?


I only want to work one job at a time though, so is being a baby raper enabler enough for me live on? What do you tell people that you do for a living because I damn sure wouldn't tell anybody that I was running cover for child butchers and baby rapers.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

2 months, 91ccp

How DO you keep up with that MASSIVE ~1.3ccp/day of contributions to Voat?

[–] dragonkiller 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

2 months, 91ccp

How DO you keep up with that MASSIVE ~1.3ccp/day of contributions to Voat?

I operate on quality instead of quantity. That is why that big point tally on your username makes you look like a big fat maggot mouth. I would have to talk an enormous amount of shit and tell a lot of lies to be as big of an asshole as you are and I am not up to the task.

[–] NotHereForPizza 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Hey, Crensch, should I go through your posts and look through all the times you replied to comments with criticism by only responding with the amount of time that account has been active? It's funny that you don't know how many people are watching this. Do you really think every new account is some shill? That's one diluted world you must live in.

Sort of like how you're a newfag and can't spot shill trends. It was fun to learn about that, wasn't it bud? I'd be up for a similar challenge if you have some time. I know I do.

[–] Disappointed 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2390929/11903943 <----- in this link you have two mods arguing over whether it should be deleted or not. In that case it should absolutely be allowed to be reposted as long as the user agrees to make it more clear, which it seems like they admitted it could be. If there's any doubt about it breaking a rule, let the users decide.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Vindicator posting afterwards doesn't make M_F's already having deleted it wrong, so it's not like he could take it back. Or am I missing something?

I think I might agree if the user simply reposted what was there after the fact.

Before I say something I'm not 100% sure on, but might have to defend, what's your take on the submission?

[–] Disappointed 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'm not saying it was wrong and it shouldn't matter. What should matter is it seems there is enough contention around the post being suitable or not, that the users should decide. It's their sub. If the rules don't cover it 100 percent, let the votes decide. Even if you personally think rules cover it, let it go as a test then adjust the rules according to how the userbase reacted. A good mod or owner should have a grasp on the evolving community.

what's your take on the submission?

I have no take on it at all. I have no clue what is relevant or not and no interest in following the lives and times of pedos that I don't think will be caught. Hopefully I'm wrong and their future includes flames

[–] letsdothis1 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Order, order !

In that case, I better go and sort out the title of my latest post :-)

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

If that's all you got from my OP, you have bigger issues than how you format your post.

[–] ESOTERICshade 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

If that's all you got from my OP, you have bigger issues than how you format your post.

This is a seriously deep rabbit hole with Welcome Trust and all of its affiliated parties. It literally would take hours just to get a decent grip on how complicated and vast it is, and then even longer to truly comprehend it. This cannot be understood in a couple of explanatory paragraphs. But that is what the sub ONCE DID, research and dot connecting from a few affiliations, that it can't do now without passing over Falcon's impossible nit picks and opinions.

@kevdude @vindicator @letsdothis1 @swordfish69 @think-

[–] letsdothis1 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

First, let me just say that I appreciate that you guys are looking into this.

EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post

I thought that if you read through my threads it should be clear how it fits together. I appreciate sometimes though that the linking may be not too obvious if you don't follow this forum closely. I'm always happy to clarify if that is the case. However to delete an entire post without the opportunity to edit makes it difficult to bring it back.

Also, summarizing a complicated thread can be very difficult - personally I think it's unnecessary and just creates a 'dumbing down' effect. Also, sometimes it is not possible for a researcher to weave a whole story together and that's the whole point of posting on here, to crowdsource information. It's usually quite obvious which posters are genuinely trying to pull information together as opposed to the posters who are here to clutter up the forum with rubbish.

My 2 cents.

[–] kevdude 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

@ESOTERICshade

@crensch, you make valid critiques, but that is not the reasoning MF is giving.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Notice how esoteric didn't respond when you said my critiques were valid?

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

To clarify, I didn't see another M_F comment on the subject.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2390929/11907248

It's not?

The post was removed primarily due to lack of clarity (Rule 3). It is a list of claims/links with no attempt to explicitly connect much of it.

[–] kevdude 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Ok I'm sick of this subverse.

[–] letsdothis1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The penalty isn't a warning, faggot.

You're English, aren't you?

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I love it when people try to skiptrace me.

[–] oftotc 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I see this type of "research" online and discard it immediately. It's just like an 8th grade science fair project! I personally believe that the PG sub is being purposefully overrun with shit data and the current mod (who gets all kind of shit for doing his job!) doesn't clear out enough of the shit. They (who ever "they" are) are using information overload to slide the forum away from its principal cast and locales and these shit posts from carmencita and the like are the primary ammunition. Crensch, please don't do that whole temp kill the mods thing. I don't buy it for a minute (and esotericshade is full of shit on this) that the OP you cited is some kind of genius what kant speek his mind proper. shade's a bit of a faker and if he leaves, PG will not have lost as much as he boasts it to be.

[–] dragonkiller 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

I personally believe that the PG sub is being purposefully overrun with shit data and the current mod (who gets all kind of shit for doing his job!) doesn't clear out enough of the shit.

roflmao, prolly a falcon alt. I think Falcon also has an alt named "rabidrabbi" but i'm not positive about that one.

[–] letsdothis1 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

"rabidrabbi"? That would be hilarious. I need to go check that out.

[–] letsdothis1 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Crensch, you need to try harder. Lol.

[–] ESOTERICshade 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Crensch, you need to try harder. Lol.

No doubt. roflmao....That bait alt account is so obvious its not even funny, or actually it is funny. That is why they are constantly accusing people of being alts. Guilty dog barks first and all that ya know :)

[–] oftotc 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Crensch, you need to try harder. Lol.

@Crensch

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I appreciate the input. I tend to agree.

[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

@heygeorge let me know what you think if you would please, sir.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)