You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] kingkongwaswrong ago 

my thoughts

  • already discovered is a good one,
  • potential lead is a good one
  • new evidence is a good one
  • 'how is this relevant', and 'needs sources' would be deleted as per the rules wouldn t they?
  • already debunked requires us to be pretty sure its debunked, so not sure

I think the cpp false flag just reflects what the community thinks it is? Open to discussion though

0
0

[–] Melitica ago 

I think already discovered is a must.

0
0

[–] Millennial_Falcon ago  (edited ago)

I guess New lead and new evidence could be combined into "new lead or new evidence"

'how is this relevant', and 'needs sources' would be deleted as per the rules wouldn t they?

I agree on "how is this relevant" to an extent. However, relevance is kind of subjective. Maybe an "off-topic" flair?

On, "needs sources," the reason I think we need that one is that a disinformation post could provide tons of sources and bombard readers with info, but could be lacking a source for a key claim.

0
0

[–] Crensch [S] ago 

'how is this relevant', and 'needs sources' would be deleted as per the rules wouldn t they?

Not... necessarily. I think some posts slip through the removal tier without the rules being applicable, and head to the flair tier directly.

0
0

[–] Crensch [S] ago 

I put "possible false flag" there - we're mods, not the arbiters of what's false and what isn't.