Rules 1, 2, and 3 are submission-removable offenses, along with the video rule. (Was 7, moving to 4 for organizational purposes.)
The rules after the video post as of the time when the sidebar of /v/pizzagate is changed to reflect the above, are flair-level offenses since they're a bit less solid than the first four. Subjective wording is our enemy, as things open to interpretation are the gateway drugs of censorship.
8, (meta concerns) for the moment, is a valid stanalone removal rule with the caveat that response comment to the submitter asking them to find the link in the side bar, or providing it for them, is given.
9 (spam) is sitewide and remains the same - "spam" is not a catch-all and has a very specific definition, so if you're not sure, flair it and move on.
Post subject to self-deletion for a more accurate or better version later.
Sort: Top
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck @Crensch
We need to add new flair options, asap. Flairs needed: "How is this relevant?", "Already discovered", "Needs sources", "Already debunked", "Potential Lead", "New evidence"
Also want to mention we can't assume the CPP incident yesterday was a Flase Flag. To me, it's 50/50 at this point. I don't think we should jump to conclusions, so I'm not a fan of the "CPP False Flag" flair. Thoughts?
[–] kingkongwaswrong ago
my thoughts
I think the cpp false flag just reflects what the community thinks it is? Open to discussion though
[–] Melitica ago
I think already discovered is a must.
[–] Millennial_Falcon ago (edited ago)
I guess New lead and new evidence could be combined into "new lead or new evidence"
I agree on "how is this relevant" to an extent. However, relevance is kind of subjective. Maybe an "off-topic" flair?
On, "needs sources," the reason I think we need that one is that a disinformation post could provide tons of sources and bombard readers with info, but could be lacking a source for a key claim.
[–] Crensch [S] ago
Not... necessarily. I think some posts slip through the removal tier without the rules being applicable, and head to the flair tier directly.
[–] Crensch [S] ago
I put "possible false flag" there - we're mods, not the arbiters of what's false and what isn't.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Would "Possible false flag" be a good one?
[–] Crensch [S] ago
Actually, if you want to take point on that, I'd appreciate it.
[–] Millennial_Falcon ago
How do I do that?
[–] Crensch [S] ago
Are there any currently in use at all? Can only have 10 flairs total.
[–] Millennial_Falcon 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Dang. OK, I'm going to think about this. Will get back to you guys with thoughts.
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck @Crensch
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] Crensch [S] ago
Letting the downvotes that most of these guys can't give do the job?
[–] Crensch [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
@kevdude @kingkongwaswrong @KnowThyself @Melitica @numbchuck
[–] Crensch [S] ago
@Millennial_Falcon