0
10

[–] Orange_Circle 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

All the pedophile cover-up roads lead to Rome.

0
5

[–] Jeremy20_9 [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It does seem that way, doesn't it?

Once this reached the highest levels of government(s), it's not unreasonable to assume it spread through the power networks like a virus, and the longer it went undiscovered, the more entrenched it became.

These are like we'll traveled roads now.

Maybe that's the reason why elites seem so brazen about it (see Miley Cyrus), they've got away with it for so long they've forgotten the seething hatred we have for it.

0
0

[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Nice work. Have some upvoats.

0
1

[–] dindonufin 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

behind the walls of the vatican

0
1

[–] GoHeadBeGoneWithIt 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
6

[–] Orangutan 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] CoolestMRT 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

So they all had the story then deleted them? Why do three very American, democratic news sites care about a foreign, socialist country's exploits? How does that relate back to them?

0
0

[–] Catsfive 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I used to work at one of these three-letter online news agencies, and, just to be clear, the sites above license the "breaking" news content so that people can just get all their "global" news in one place. The contract stipulates that the AP content has to be removed after a negotiated period of time. Back when we marked up these stories by hand, we'd have to put special AP comments in the markup so that the maintenance bot could remove the stories before they are offlined into the slower news archive servers.

0
5

[–] LostandFound 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thank you! the NYT has been on some heavy set detachment from reality. I wondered how you would totally cuck an entire publication like that. Time to dig on this guy.

0
0

[–] Trs0817 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Cuck is normally used when someone/thing is usually viewed as conservative. The NYT already has no standards so its pretty typically behavior.

0
4

[–] LaDonnaRae 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You missed the CEO, Mark Thompson. He is the one who, while working for the BBC, covered up the Hampstead ring.

0
0

[–] DarkMath 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

He covered up the Jimmy Savile affair not the Hempstead Ring which was mostly likely a hoax. ;-)

0
0

[–] LaDonnaRae 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Wrong. You could be right about Savile, but you are wrong about it being a hoax. But thank you for playing.

1
2

[–] party1981 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

You don't even have to get that specific.

Carlos Slim bought the New York Times (most of it, or a lot of it).

He also donated millions and millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

Case closed.

0
7

[–] Jeremy20_9 [S] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I agree that NYTimes is a completely compromised news source, but I do think it's valuable to note the key players shutting down stories.

When Dean Baquet came to the times he already had a reputation as "subservient to intelligence community" as Glenn Greenwald put it, he displaced a popular Executive Editor Jill Abramson, and the timing was pretty good for Hillary, wouldn't you say?

0
1

[–] party1981 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that you can just look at to Carlos Slim and the CF to see the corruption. You are adding more detail.

0
1

[–] LostandFound 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Here's info on how he displaced her kinda https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/127433 he scores a few times on wikileaks

0
2

[–] LostandFound 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That's very true and you have a solid point. Still think looking into how this works is important. People like slim and guistra don't get their hands dirty anymore but people trying to make a mark they do, those are the people who will make mistakes.

0
2

[–] Sentastixc 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Definitely a person of interest. Good work.

0
1

[–] jonnythaiwongy9 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Great post, while Slim owns it and pushes the agenda, he needs pawns willing to execute, the question is who would be willing to do such immoral things, and why? Are they in on it, or vulnerable to blackmail?

0
1

[–] salinaslayer 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Another pawn identified, great work

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)