Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] rickman2 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hang on. I've read that the main girls parents are conservative. I've also read reviews that state the film condemns the industry and behaviour the girls take part it. That it doesn't say exploiting children is a good thing. So why is the writer attacking conservative people? Aren't the conservative parents in the film the ones who are in the right?
I don't even want to or need to see the film to know this is just mental gymnastics from these weirdos. If the film doesn't exploit and sexualise children in a positive way, then she should be praising conservatives and saying "Yes, you're right. That is the story we're telling. That children in todays society are being mistreated."
And I read further and see
I really must read the whole article. Clearly this sick bitch is lying through her teeth at every obstacle to not end up in a police interrogation room.
[–] Just4kicks 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's wrong because real girls were groomed to portray that under the guise of "acting" we don't need kids to act sexy to protest it is wrong. Find another way besides exploiting a child.
[–] SearchVoatBot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#132505) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@rickman2: Click here to suppress your anonymous crosslink notifications)
[–] kestrel9 ago
It's not uncommon for leftists to consider legal prostitution a celebration of female sexuality. They don't say much about child prostitution (yet), but many, support a low age of consent and 'intergenerational relationships'. Having sexual twerking be 'liberating' for 11 year old girls and a cause for celebration is just another step on the path for normalizing pedophilia. Reminds me of a young 11 year old drag kid, "Desmond is Amazing", being 'liberated and celebrated' by dancing for dollars at a gay bar.
[–] elcob32 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
If you really want to stop this shit, every member of the board of directors for Netflix should be brought up on charges of distribution.
[–] The1stLantern 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
One look at Early Life section tells you he won't. Get real.
[–] A_Punkass_Bitch 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
could, but won't
[–] 771423x1 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"celebrate women and female sexuality"....but these kids were 10, 11, 12 years old. What in the holiest of craps were they thinking? There is absolutely no defending this. How did nobody throughout the whole production stop and consider the actual motivations behind the film and the true intended audience?
[–] GreasyCaveman 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
About fucking time we draw a line in the sand!
[–] Popad 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Here we go...could, just might, maybe, considering, possibly, why i otta.
[–] glassuser 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"could"