Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Vindicator ago (edited ago)
I would say the adults are definitely exploiting this kid. He's precocious and charismatic, and they all want to make money off of him -- his parents, the pizza guy and Ellen. No doubt pedos love his show. Nor can they resist making adult comments they know he won't understand, for their audiences.
At 7:37, pizza guy asks whether girls have been "Sliding into his DMs, saying 'Hey, Shirley Temple King!'"
The kid says "Yeah, and then they would want to take photos of me."
Pizza guy says "Yeah, I certainly believe it. That's the price of fame. It's fun, though, right?"
IMO "It's" appears to refer to being an internet sensation, not specifically to receiving DMs from girls.
Given the fact this kid is not making any allusions himself and seems oblivious to the darker connotations of what the pizza guy is saying, I'd say he has not been abused. And based on his use of the word "would", it sounds to me like his parents are doing a pretty good job protecting him from "girls sliding into his DMs". It doesn't sound like he understands what type of photos people might want in DMs. Thank God.
As for the pizza reviewer guy, I didn't get a pedo-y vibe from this at all, just a guy whoring for clicks. I looked through some of the comments on the YouTube video and didn't see the typical pedo grooming stuff we saw on some of the toy review videos a few years ago, either.