Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Vindicator 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well I'll be damned. Never seen that error before! I tried to re-archive, and it wouldn't do it. I guess that's not surprising, considering we're dealing with the MIT Media Lab, eh? Here's the original page: https://www.wildflowerdesigning.com/
Here's a screenshot: https://files.catbox.moe/byvai0.jpg
Thanks for catching this.
I wonder if that page has some kind of embedded code that prevents it from being scraped by archive.is?
[–] shewhomustbeobeyed 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You're welcome.
wildflowerdesigning - https://archive.fo/UVQCt
image - https://archive.is/qO85Z
[–] argosciv 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
While that is possible, Vin, this site isn't doing so.
https://archive.fo/wtmXe
The problem was a network error (timeout) while archive.fo was trying to do its thing; the timeout was being caused by larger photo uploads not loading. That said, even if all the photos load (as was the case above, resulting in a successful snapshot), none are visible on the archive snapshot because their visibility is being controlled by javascript (which does not run when archiving).
As for the photo in your screenshot, I'm not getting immediate alarm bells as the craftwork there is just the lifecycle of a moth, which is at least a little distinct from the butterfly symbolism allegedly sometimes associated with the supposed MK Ultra-related Monarch program.
Possibly something nefarious, but not certain myself.
Could be a something with Holleman involved -- I remember somewhat recently looking at all that stuff re: Psychanaut, but forget some of the details and what my thoughts were after digging. Pretty sure it wasn't fully confirmed/denied in the end that Psychanaut is Holleman, but I'd have to go looking again.
Wouldn't surprise me if Psychanaut = Holleman = Controlled Opposition (or if Psychanaut =/= Holleman, but Holleman = Controlled Opposition), would need to be proven though.
It is also possible that Holleman wasn't a problem, the article/question linked in the main post doesn't necessarily strike me as problematic.
Psychanaut does however have several submissions which indicate fuckery/controlled opposition or being duped/manipulated.
https://voat.co/v/PizzagateNoMod/1943799/
https://voat.co/v/PizzagateNoMod/1992426/
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2224728/
Could be that this is an attempt to dredge up the past and waste time though: OP's account was dead for nearly a year before suddenly being used again for this 4 days ago (last prior submission was 11 months ago, last prior comment was 1.1 years ago). /shrug
Further to the above, take a closer look at this comment section and tread discerningly.
[–] Vindicator ago
Thank you for your thoughts on this argo. Solid analysis.