[–] carmencita 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Shameful and Vomit Inducing. Just Horrid. @new4now

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Now is the time to fight. Otherwise the states will fall like "dominos on pizza." Nowhere to run. VACCINES WILL BE FORCED CHILD SACRIFICE.

[–] carmencita 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I feel as though they already are. I abhor them. I was present at a birth of a girl born to a cousin and they took this baby out of the room quickly late at night to vaccinate her. I forget what it was they gave her but an Integral Medicine Dr. told me that they are giving babies a huge amount of this vac and they don't need it. This just plain sickened me. I happen to know that the Mother of this girl has kept her from getting vacs up until now. The fight continues. Thank you for your posts on this. They are so very important. I also knew someone with polio. Another story.

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Here is a very interesting exchange regarding the oft repeated demand that individuals get vaccinated in order to protect the immunocompromised:

"Erin April 14, 2019 at 7:57 pm Wow really. I”m appalled at the ignorance on this article and the responses so here’s your example. More than 6000 people are diagnosed each year with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (that’s just one type and they are mostly children). My husband is one of them. Most of those go on to receive bone marrow transplants. Those transplant patients go through a rigorous amount of chemotherapy that essentially kills off everything within their body and their ability to fight infection such as the measles outbreak. They are unable to at that time to go on with vaccines despite your theory that people can get them whenever they want. Their bodies are not strong enough to take on the vaccines. All vaccines they had as children will be readministered after they are recovered from the transplant. Their bodies are essentially that I’ve newborn babies only much weaker. For my husband that was about a year and a half after his bone marrow transplant. That means that during that year and a half, we had to be extremely careful not to expose him to any illnesses. Because you choose not to vaccinate against things like measles are putting these patients at risk. Measles spreads very quickly because it is so highly contagious and it is lethal to immunocompromised people such as my husband. Do some research."

RESPONSE:

"Redpill April 15, 2019 at 10:22 pm I feel for your husband. Think of this though. Society is not your personal gate keeper. Sorry to be harsh but I’m tired of people like you who want others to sacrifice for them.

Immunocompromised people didn’t just smurf out of the blue in the last 20 years. There have always been people who immune systems have been weakened for one reason or another. The whole pro-vaccine agenda of vaccinating to protecting immunocompromised is just another con. Like the mythical Herd Immunity. Do you have any idea just how many COMMUNICABLE DISEASES there are that have NO vaccines for? Do some research on that. You think you’re worried now? If your husband is so medically fragile-getting a bad cold could kill him. There is no vaccine for the common cold. Norovirus- very common, more than 3 million US cases per year, spreads easily-No Vaccine. Strep throat-No vaccine. The Flu. There are over 200 flu strains in the labs at the CDC, flu shot has up to 4 and they have been wrong for the last decade. But if it makes you feel better knowing your husband is sitting next to a person vaccinated for the Flu shot-bless your heart.

Flu shot shed: CDC Funded Study Shows the Vaccinated Shed 6.3 Times More Flu Virus, Just by Breathing- https://thewilddoc.com/cdc-funded-study-shows-the-vaccinated-shed-6-3-times-more-flu-virus-just-by-breathing/ MMR tells you right on the package insert this: “Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination.” -Journal of Microbiology: During the measles outbreak in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in recent vaccinees (3). Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences (R. J. McNall, unpublished data). Plain English, measles outbreaks were occurring among children who were already vaccinated with the measles. If you do the math, nearly 38% of the genetic sequences that were conducted on supposed “measles” cases turned out to identify measles strains that originated in the vaccines themselves. Thus, more than one out of three cases of measles in the United States was actually a reaction from a measles vaccine, not “wild-type” measles. https://jcm.asm.org/content/55/3/735

-Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 22;154(16):1815-20. Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Poland GA1, Jacobson RM. -Paper: The Re-Emergence of Measles in Developed Countries: Time to Develop the Next-Generation Measles Vaccines? The measles vaccine has failed, he explained two years ago in a prescient paper, “The re-emergence of measles in developed countries.” In that paper, he warned that due to factors that most haven’t noticed, measles has come back to be a serious public health threat. Poland sees the need for a major rethink, after concluding that the current measles vaccine is unlikely to ever live up to the job expected of it: “outbreaks are occurring even in highly developed countries where vaccine access, public health infrastructure, and health literacy are not significant issues. Dr. Gregory Poland is Professor of Medicine and founder and leader of Mayo Clinic’s Vaccine Research Group. Poland is one of the world’s most admired, most advanced thinkers in the field of vaccinology.

-Chickenpox Attributable to a Vaccine Virus Contracted From a Vaccinee With Zoster: Five months after 2 siblings were immunized with varicella vaccine, 1 developed zoster. Two weeks later the second sibling got a mild case of chicken pox. Virus isolated from the latter was found to be vaccine type. Thus, the vaccine strain was transmitted from the vaccinee with zoster to his sibling. Vaccinees who later develop zoster must be considered contagious. https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/2/e28.full.

-Whooping Cough: The study, titled: “Acellular Pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model,” used infant baboons to test the hypothesis that “current acellular pertussis vaccines fail to prevent colonization and transmission” of B. Pertussis. (there is no vaccine for Bordetella Pertussis virus) Lead author Tod Merkel did comment to the New York Times that when exposed to B. Pertussis after recently getting vaccinated, you could be an asymptomatic carrier and infect others, saying:

“When you’re newly vaccinated, you are an asymptomatic carrier, which is good for you, but not for the population.” According to Tod Merkel of the FDA, it has now become clear that the vaccine does almost nothing to prevent the spread of whooping cough. Although it does seem to prevent about 80 percent of people from showing symptoms of the disease, it does not prevent them from catching it or spreading it.

Most current study: Study: Whooping cough resurgence due to vaccinated people not knowing they’re infectious? From study/article: “a detailed epidemiological model of whooping cough transmission to conclude that acellular vaccines may well have contributed to — even exacerbated — the recent pertussis outbreak by allowing infected individuals without symptoms to unknowingly spread pertussis multiple times in their lifetimes.

‘There could be millions of people out there with just a minor cough or no cough spreading this potentially fatal disease without knowing it,’ said Althouse. ‘The public health community should act now to better assess the true burden of pertussis infection.’

What’s worse, their model shows that if the disease can be spread through vaccinated, asymptomatic individuals essentially undetected, the level of vaccination needed to protect those that are unvaccinated (so-called ‘herd immunity’) is over 99 percent, impractically high at a time when anti-vaccine campaigns are turning people away from vaccination. clinicalnews(dot)org/2015/06/24/study-whooping-cough-resurgence-due-to-vaccinated-people-not-knowing-theyre-infectious/comment-page-1/. From study/article:

St. Jude Children Hospital Visiting guidelines- https://www.stjude.org/treatment/patient-resources/caregiver-resources/patient-family-education-sheets/prevent-control-infection/visiting-guidelines.html • Many St. Jude patients have weak immune systems. Visitors should not enter the hospital if they are sick or have been exposed to illnesses that are easy to spread (contagious). • Some vaccines are made from live viruses, which can pose a threat to the health of St. Jude patients. Visitors should not enter the hospital: • If they have received the oral polio or smallpox vaccine within 4 weeks; or • If they have rashes after receiving the chickenpox (varicella) vaccine.

Notice how St. Jude requested VACCINATED PEOPLE not visit. Not the UNVACCINATED.

If someone you know is having treatment: Do not bring children if they are unwell, have been with other children with an infection, or have had recent vaccinations. https://www.macmillan.org.uk/information-and-support/treating/stem-cell-and-bone-marrow-transplants/stem-cell-and-bone-marrow-transplants-explained/someone-you-know-having-treatment.html You need to take your own advice: Research."

"Redpill April 13, 2019 at 4:00 pm I get hit with that often on comment boards: “unvaccinated child might expose another unvaccinated child who can’t receive a vaccine because of an existing medical condition.”

When this happens I direct them to the CDC’s own website which says the immunocompromised can be vaccinated by following certain protocols laid out on their website, it just depends on each individual circumstances. ..."

"Carol April 14, 2019 at 11:13 pm It’s mind-blowing reading the CDC’s recommendations that all these fragile immunocompromised children receive all these vaccines. It becomes absolutely obvious that they only care about pushing maximum vaccines rather than looking out for the health of our people. My guess is that they want to make absolutely sure that no doctor can give a medical exemption to an immunocompromised child. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00023141.htm "

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/04/no-you-dont-have-a-right-to-demand-that-others-are-vaccinated/

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

SV40 AND THE POLIO VACCINE

"SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or “Live” Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.

In 1961, SV40 was discovered by Dr. Bernice Eddy of the National Institute of Health, Division of Biologics when she took the material used to grow polio vaccines and injected it into hamsters. Tumors grew in the hamsters. Her discovery was subsequently validated by Drs. Maurice Hilliman and Benjamin Sweet of Merck.

Upon the discovery that SV40 was an animal carcinogen that had found its way into the polio vaccines, a new federal law was passed in 1961 that required that no vaccines contain this virus. However, this law did not require that SV40 contaminated vaccines be thrown away or that the contaminated seed material (used to make all polio vaccines for the next four decades) be discarded. As a result, known SV40 contaminated vaccines were injected into children up until 1963. In addition, it has been alleged that there have been SV40-contaminated batches of oral polio vaccine administered to some children until the end of the 1990’s."

"The Creation of the Oral Polio Vaccine

• In 1941, Drs. Francis and Mack isolated the Mahoney poliovirus “from the pooled feces of three healthy children in Cleveland.” Dr. Salk then subjected the strain to passages through fourteen living monkeys and two cultures of monkey testicular cultures.

• In 1954, the strain (now called Monk14 T2) was given to Drs. Li and Schaeffer who subjected the virus to nine more passages through monkey testicular cultures.

• Next, the strain (now called Monk14 T11) underwent fifteen more passages in monkey testicular cultures, eighteen passages in monkey kidney cells, two passages through the skin of living rhesus monkeys, and additional passages through African Green monkey skin and monkey kidney cell cultures. This strain was now called MS10 T43 or LS-c.

• In 1956, Dr. Sabin took this virus and passaged it through seven cultures of African Green Monkey kidney cells.

• That same year, the pharmaceutical company, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, passed the strain (now called LS-c, 2ab/KP2) through a rhesus monkey kidney cell culture.

• The resulting material was called Sabin Original Merck (SOM) and was provided to Lederle in 1960 as the seed material to manufacture its polio vaccine." https://truthlibrarydotinfo.wordpress.com/2016/03/17/sv40-cancer-foundation/

[–] carmencita 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

What does this mean?

"SV40 was the 40th virus found in rhesus monkey kidney cells when these cells were used to make the polio vaccine. This virus contaminated both the Inactivated Polio Vaccine (IPV) created by Dr. Jonas Salk and the Oral or “Live” Polio Vaccine (OPV) created by Dr. Albert Sabin.

The virus was contaminated so when the Children were vaccinated was it possible that some got polio from the vaccine itself? This would be frightening. If this was the case, the person I know of was born around that time and probably did receive that vaccine.

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

"How Close Are We To Forced Vaccinations For All?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPGrB0Ndoxo

[–] auralsects 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[–] bennyquirk 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

evil smart dust

Orwell: ------- fabian society --------- @madmalloy @webofslime @gothamgirl @shewhomustbeobeyed no consent for starters

No one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it 1984 describes the ultimate tyranny to come. Or the retro-nightmare future that might-have-been, had it not been outdone by reality. Aldous Huxley – famous author, ..

https://www.aircrap.org/2019/04/14/5g-s-m-a-r-t-secret-militarized-armaments-in-residential-technology/

[–] derram 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=PN7FQCkiBp8 :

Stanley Plotkin - abortion’s for vaccines - 2018 deposition - YouTube

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=rGDNsqk0KR0YouTube :

Stanley Plotkin, Godfather of vaccines, UNDER OATH! - Part 1/9 - YouTube


This has been an automated message.

[–] shewhomustbeobeyed 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

HARSH REALITY: What parent wants to offer up their healthy child for a level 1 vaccine safety trial? These children took the heat so your child could have a safer vaccine:

Vaccine Safety Studies on Orphans, Handicapped and More - Stanley Plotkin Under Oath: Starts at 4:49 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk_sv2HiMa0

Plotkin on VAERS, Adverse reactions from vaccines, Harvard Study 1% adverse reactions reported https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3x0rQT_eSw

[–] septimasexta [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thank you Ginger Taylor, MS for standing against a forced vaccination bill in Maine! Ginger sent every member of the Maine Legislature this letter:

Dear Representative,

The religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions exist for very good reason.

There is a vaccine conversation that is upsetting for many, that must be had now. It is a discussion that the sponsors of vaccine exemption removal bills are unlikely to even know of, and is easily dismissed as internet rumor. I myself avoided this topic for the first 10 years of my 15 years of vaccine safety advocacy because I simply didn't want to face the reality of it. However, the topic is central to your deliberations on the removal of the religious and philosophical exemptions proposed by LD 798. Because some of those testifying on Wednesday will broach the subject, it is incumbent upon me to prepare you with the clinical facts at this time.

There are vaccines made with, and containing, materials that are morally and religiously objectionable to many Mainers. At the top of that list are the WI-38 and MRC-5 cell lines.

I have included the clinical information from the distributor on these two products in the links above. Please review the "General Information" carefully.

I am also including a video by Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, so that you may have confirmation on this matter from the principle vaccine industry spokesperson.

These WI-38 and MRC-5 cells are used to grow viruses in, and are destroyed in the manufacturing process, however the residual human blood products (human albumin) and DNA fragments remain in the final product as delivered. The passage of LD 798 will mandate the purchase and intake of these human derived products by Mainers who are vehemently opposed to this practice and who do not wish to do business with the industry that supplies these types of cell lines, in order to fully participate in society. (These cell lines have a shelf-life, so research into new cell lines, such as the new WALVAX-2, is ongoing.)

Further, there are other morally and religiously objectionable materials in vaccines that Mainers will be forced to inject to become educated Mainers. I have attached the full CDC vaccine ingredient list for your review.

As I am sure you can understand, many Mainers will find the use of bovine serum and porcine tissue religiously and ethically objectionable, and I hope you can agree that they have the right to refuse products using and containing human and animal biological material without coercion.

Because the MMR and Chickenpox vaccines contain all three of these substances, the purchase and injection of these objectionable materials will become required for full participation in public life. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf

"M-M-R ® II (MEASLES, MUMPS, and RUBELLA VIRUS VACCINE LIVE) DESCRIPTION M-M-R ® II (Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Virus Vaccine Live) is a live virus vaccine for vaccination against measles (rubeola), mumps, and rubella (German measles).

M-M-R II is a sterile lyophilized preparation of (1) ATTENUVAX® (Measles Virus Vaccine Live), a more attenuated line of measles virus, derived from Enders' attenuated Edmonston strain and propagated in chick embryo cell culture; (2) MUMPSVAX® (Mumps Virus Vaccine Live), the Jeryl Lynn™ (B level) strain of mumps virus propagated in chick embryo cell culture; and (3) MERUVAX® II (Rubella Virus Vaccine Live), the Wistar RA 27/3 strain of live attenuated rubella virus propagated in WI-38 human diploid lung fibroblasts.{1,2}

The growth medium for measles and mumps is Medium 199 (a buffered salt solution containing vitamins and amino acids and supplemented with fetal bovine serum) containing SPGA (sucrose, phosphate, glutamate, and recombinant human albumin) as stabilizer and neomycin.

The growth medium for rubella is Minimum Essential Medium (MEM) [a buffered salt solution containing vitamins and amino acids and supplemented with fetal bovine serum] containing recombinant human albumin and neomycin. Sorbitol and hydrolyzed gelatin stabilizer are added to the individual virus harvests.

The cells, virus pools, and fetal bovine serum are all screened for the absence of adventitious agents.

The reconstituted vaccine is for subcutaneous administration. Each 0.5 mL dose contains not less than 1,000 TCID50 (tissue culture infectious doses) of measles virus; 12,500 TCID50 of mumps virus; and 1,000 TCID50 of rubella virus. Each dose of the vaccine is calculated to contain sorbitol (14.5 mg), sodium phosphate, sucrose (1.9 mg), sodium chloride, hydrolyzed gelatin (14.5 mg), recombinant human albumin (≤0.3 mg), fetal bovine serum (<1 ppm), other buffer and media ingredients and approximately 25 mcg of neomycin. The product contains no preservative." So a central question that will be posed is:

How do the sponsors of LD 798 justify removing First Amendment rights of Mainers to the free exercise of their religion by abstaining from the use of medical products made with WI-38, MRC-5, Bovine, Porcine and other objectionable materials?

These are just a few of the reasons that the removal of non-medical vaccine exemptions is unacceptable.

https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/04/a-difficult-discussion-wi-38-and-mrc-5.html

[–] carmencita 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago