Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Podge512 ago
Razorfist has done two videos tearing apart Reed's bullshit 'documentary' and apparently, the UK version is 45 minutes shorter than the US version because Reed, in true Orwellian fashion, decided to cut out the segments with the glaring inconsistencies and timeline discrepancies that were called out in the UK press. While it is probable Jackson was a paedophile (there is at least one CDAN blind item that alleges prospective child extras for the film Hook were abused at Neverland Ranch), I can't help but think this schlockumentary, apart from distracting from proven abuser Harvey Weinstein (a documentary on Weinstein was supposed to appear at the same film festival which Leaving Neverland was fast-tracked to), is supposed to poison the well; take two bullshit artists who are looking for a payday from the Jackson estate, put them centre stage and when their stories are discredited, the true stories of victims of the rampant child sexual abuse in Paedowood can and will be painted with that brush.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yTTEwBLfUQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYx0vLfpRYY&t=73s
[–] Otto- 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yeah, that's a fair point. Like I've always said, I'm not surprised either way if Jackson's guilty, it doesn't really matter to me, but I never liked the production of the doco and don't like this Reed the more I hear of him.
Just to be clear, I do care what the truth is, but I don't care for MJ's career, I don't care for his music or what people think of him, because he's dead now. It's too late. If anything else, even if Jackson's perfectly innocent, this at least opens people up to the ever-increasing belief that their heroes in the past were sick and crooked, which is a sentiment I can't endorse enough. If they get used to the idea, Steven Spielberg and Tom Hanks will be easier to accept. And they're still alive. And this time it involves deaths.