You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-2

[–] think- 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not sure whether IMDB ratings say anything about whether a film is well or poorly done.

And I'm afraid you don't present any actual evidence for your claim 'Leaving Neverland director is a shill' (see headline).

0
2

[–] rickman [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The evidence is what I presented. That he specialises in events which are surrounded by conspiracies and decides to focus on minor aspects as if to divert attention away from the bigger picture. And I disagree about your opinion on IMDB ratings. Even average films get 5s or 6s. For someone to get ratings in the 2s and 3s suggest he is seriously inferior in his field.

0
2

[–] pizza-party-pooper-2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm inclined to agree with rickman. Have to admit, I never watched the alleged doc and I don't intend to. If they want to convince me of MJ being a pedo they need to go back and photograph the privates of the McMartin perps the way they did MJ. Hmmm, interesting even after being forensically photographed for the court proceedings he still wasn't convicted. Maybe he was simply NOT GUILTY. Perhaps because it was a part of the usual MO: Character assassination before real assassination. Just a thought.

0
0

[–] think- ago 

What exactly in the film or regarding the way 'Leaving Neverland' was done makes you think he is a shill?

I think that would be a good starting point for trying to find out whether he is a shill or not.