Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] carmencita 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Laptop just disintegrated all my links Sorry. Here is what I have to say. I know I have read that he let it slip somewhere and that is what is causing all the rumors. Many articles on whether he is or not. This one is ridiculous.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/10/30/daniel-radcliffe-gay-sex-especially-for-the-first-time-is-really-painful-2/
gay sex especially for the first time is really painful Now, why would he allow a headline like that?
Here is something from Data Lounge a gay site I sometimes check with for things like this. He has a Roommate. We also learn he has had drinking problems which is a side affect of sexual abuse. You decide.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/13241358-daniel-radcliffe-s-male-roommate
[–] Piscina 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Sodomy is painful because the sphincter muscle is meant to push thing out, not be pushed in. The majority of prolapsed colon and then surgical restructuring is from anal sex. It just should not be a thing, whether you're gay or straight.
[–] carmencita 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is my feeling too. That is why it kills me to think about how horribly raped some of the young actors were. It makes sense it drove some to drink and drugs and even suicide. The ones that live, well their lives are a Holy Hell. They take their very souls. There must be more mental health centers opened for the sexually abused. This should be something the Church should have to fund after all the pain and suffering they have caused. Not to mention Pedowood. I truly believe that homosexuals are created not born. Brutal Rape for years and years.
[–] cantfindmenow 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Why would he allow a headline like that? Well for one, he isn't talking about personal experience. He is talking about what the director told him, in relation to a scene. This argument is very weak. This article does not suggest he is gay and does not suggest he was abused.
[–] carmencita ago
What I was trying to say is that he is skirting the issue while making statements that are on the edge. The fact that he is in the movie industry that has been researched up the ying yang by us for horrid abuse, well we know there is no way he could have escaped it. Him also having a roommate at his age and with his wealth also makes one wonder. There are many other articles where people say that they have heard him say it but now he acts if it was never said. I hope he was not abused but I do not believe he could have escaped their demands.