Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] carmencita 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"a never ending cycle of sexual abuse" I have been suspicious of harry potter for about two years. I thought it was way to violent for younger Children to start out with and we know the leading male star is gay. What happened to him on the movie set? Again, unprotected Children. Where were the parents and the Children's tutors? Blindfolded by Money.
[–] Oh_Well_ian 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Casting directors are not just looking at the children, they are looking at the parents.
They want the greedy and morally weak.
[–] carmencita 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I truly believe you are right. This is the pedophile's dream a single mom or hollywood groupie mom that will eat up their adoration. Their first job is in grooming the parents and then the Children. Unfortunately there seem to be too many of these around. Many years ago parents may have been unaware of their tactics but now with the internet and what has been revealed about many of the abused Child actors, there is no excuse when this occurs. Gee Willikers Parents, Stay With Your Child.
[–] mrnicegoy 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
huh? whats his face (daniel something?) who played harry potter is gay?
[–] carmencita 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Laptop just disintegrated all my links Sorry. Here is what I have to say. I know I have read that he let it slip somewhere and that is what is causing all the rumors. Many articles on whether he is or not. This one is ridiculous.
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/10/30/daniel-radcliffe-gay-sex-especially-for-the-first-time-is-really-painful-2/
gay sex especially for the first time is really painful Now, why would he allow a headline like that?
Here is something from Data Lounge a gay site I sometimes check with for things like this. He has a Roommate. We also learn he has had drinking problems which is a side affect of sexual abuse. You decide.
https://www.datalounge.com/thread/13241358-daniel-radcliffe-s-male-roommate
[–] Clownmuseum 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
I think it's safe to assume that most actors are gay
[–] 15392392? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
When I was n film school my thesis film had kids in it. I hired a very expensive studio teacher unlike many of my class mates bc I wanted to do it the legal way and most of all I wanted to ensure the saftey of the kids I was working with. I was so upset by the whole experience. that damn teacher I paid hundreds of dollars to did nothing. They didn't keep on eye on the kids. Didn't even watch when the kids did their scenes to ensure they were safe. The studio teachers are useless and don't care. I was a nervous wreck bc not only was I directing and producing a short film I made sure the kids never left my sight bc I wanted to ensure their safety. The parents are so happy to have them cast they just don't want to be in the way so they are not really as involved as I would be if it was my kid. I think the first step in fixing pedowoods problem is fixing the studio teacher problem.
[–] carmencita 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I agree that someone should be there that is responsible for those Children. The studio teachers I am sure have decided there is no reason to watch because the directors and producers, many of which are they abusers, are the bosses and will have their way no matter what. They really should be paid better and also laws must be added to their contracts that if there is abuse of any kind and they are derelict in their duties that they will immediately be fired. I don't know how you go about achieving that, since we know who will object and LE is no better. But I do agree that is a very good place to start.
[–] HenryCabotLodge ago
Atheist - but didn't know he liked it in the rear. (Wait a minute) For awhile he was dating a teacher who was 2 years older than he was. At least that is what I read a decade ago. //// Could be Bi.
[–] carmencita ago
Could be bid. I agree. But I no way believe he is straight. He seems to like to bait people about it too. I think he is one sick dude inside. Very mixed up. Drinking problems in the past are side affects of sexual abuse as well. Sad.