You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-1

[–] garlicbulb 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Please be consistent with "possible disinformation " flairs. You used one on https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2820112 and said "Not my job [to educate yourself on various subjects] And this isn't v/conspiracy. Posts here have to give linked proof of their claims." You post something yet apply no flair and yet no linked proof of claims. Bias

0
1

[–] Vindicator [S, M] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You post something yet apply no flair and yet no linked proof of claims. Bias

What are you talking about?

2
-1

[–] garlicbulb 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

You should know exactly what i am talking about. I will explain again for you. In another thread you flaired "possible disinfo" [ https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2820112] and said when you were asked to read more so that it did not strain your incredulity, "Not my job. And this isn't v/conspiracy. Posts here have to give linked proof of their claims." In this thread that you started, you even admit you were "not 100% confident in Shimatsu's reporting" and yet you offer no linked proof of claims in the article posted. You are therefore selective as to your applying rules, unless you flair your own thread with "possible disinfo" or you are biased.