Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Vindicator 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
What fuckery is up with that title, do you think? The study isn't about blood drinking. It's about transfusions. Drinking it would literally destroy the benefits. You think this is rampant disinfo?
[–] darkknight111 [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Don’t think so. There is a disease (porphyria I think its called) that can be treated by drinking blood. Likely there is something in the blood that is not destroyed by digestion.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/born-to-the-purple-the-st/
https://mysteriousuniverse.org/2017/09/researchers-find-genetic-mutation-responsible-for-vampirism/ I would not br surprised if some sickos drank human blood. Heme is likely not destroyed by digestion.
[–] Kekmet-Peperoni 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes its porphyria its also known as the "Vampire Disease" It can be passed down genetically and can be caused by blood drinking, so spirit cooking, and transfusions for youth, are likely why it is prevalent amongst the rich. Also Chlorophyll is a perfect ethical replacement for the heme people with porphyria need to replace, its identical to heme except with an inner ring of Magnesium instead of Iron, which shouldnt matter for this purpose. "Heres where it gets crazy" one conspiracy I heard was that JFK was said to have known about all this and wanted to "go straight" so was killed for it because the Purple Scions of the elites families didnt want this new True Blood they wanted their traditions and rituals. Im not sure how true it is but its interesting.
[–] argosciv ago
/cough
Ottoman-linked/inspired propaganda designed to play on bias/fear/superstition and otherwise sensationalize the contents of the article - given that a good portion of people would just see the headline & image and then either ignore the article content or otherwise let it manipulate their perception thereof.
The study isn't disinfo, but, the headlines and images are specifically chosen in order to mess with the audience - be it just for the sake of click-baiting or deliberate manipulation/distraction.
[–] TrishaUK ago (edited ago)
I think this post by SKY News gave the impression of 'drinking blood' because of the vampire fangs they have with their article: Young blood an elixir that prevents age-related diseases, study reveals https://news.sky.com/story/drinking-young-blood-could-prevent-age-related-diseases-study-reveals-11493276 However, you are right its injections LOOK at the following article at the bottom of the page!! Baby poo probiotic 'cocktail' could help fight disease, say scientists
https://news.sky.com/story/baby-poo-probiotic-cocktail-could-help-fight-disease-say-scientists-11480738 - EDIT: It does say 'drinking' young blood - https://nypost.com/2018/09/10/young-blood-could-be-the-secret-to-long-lasting-health-study/?utm_source=NYPTwitter&utm_medium=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=SocialFlow