You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] Piscina 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago  (edited ago)

A post like this only makes the mods look bad. Every day you (the mods) are digging yourselves deeper and deeper. It is NOT normal for a mod to start a thread calling good people 'cunts' for some silly excuse for a fight. That is what Crensch did, and now Srayzie is confirming that she things some users are 'cunts'.

People are not stupid. They will come here and work it out. They will see mods undermining those they have power over, mods abusing people by calling them disgusting names and mods accusing users of nonsensical stuff.

I don't know what game the mods are playing at, but this tactic of starting threads making personal attacks on users, many they've never even interacted with, makes them look like idiots. There is clearly one rule for the mods, who can and do call users 'cunts', and another rule for users, who get some of their pretty pertinent and relevant threads taken down.

It's a pity what the mods have done to Voat.

[–] Crensch 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

A post like this only makes the mods look bad.

Maybe, to fake users like you. I find that acceptable.

Every day you (the mods) are digging yourselves deeper and deeper.

Every day you (the shills) are digging yourselves deeper and deeper.

It is NOT normal for a mod to start a thread calling good people 'cunts' for some silly excuse for a fight.

This is how I know you haven't been here 1.7 years, and that you do not belong here.

That is what Crensch did, and now Srayzie is confirming that she things some users are 'cunts'.

Your handlers didn't mention me? They should be fired for dereliction of duty, and you should be fired for being too stupid to investigate the mods of the forum you're attempting to astroturf.

People are not stupid. They will come here and work it out.

Yes, they will. And they have. The lot of you have been exposed.

They will see mods undermining those they have power over, mods abusing people by calling them disgusting names and mods accusing users of nonsensical stuff.

Mods have no power over any user here. They have power to enforce the rules and ban actual spammers and consistent rule-breakers. ANYONE can use words and archives and screenshots on Voat to destroy users, and I can tell your panties are in a knot that it happened to you and your crew.

I don't know what game the mods are playing at, but this tactic of starting threads making personal attacks on users, many they've never even interacted with, makes them look like idiots.

Being made aware of disinfo shills that cannot be banned is exactly PG material. If objective proof and evidence can show the username to be lying, then it's pretty damn important.

There is clearly one rule for the mods, who can and do call users 'cunts', and another rule for users, who get some of their pretty pertinent and relevant threads taken down.

Oh, really? Do you have any evidence for these "pertinent and relevant" threads that have been taken down? Direct links will work - find some and let me know.

Also, ANYONE can call ANYONE a cunt here, but if anyone attacks my mods, they'd better have some REAL dirt to present or I'll rip them to shreds.

It's a pity what the mods have done to Voat.

You can leave anytime, and you won't be missed.

Thanks for proving my point. I don't know how much you're getting paid and how much you're prostituting yourself out for, but whatever it is it's not worth it. Your reputation is now down the toilet and you've made yourself look cretinous.

Whatever you say, (((Chaim))).

[–] Crensch 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

[–] Vindicator [M] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Piscina, in the off chance that you are trying to be a legit v/pizzagate citizen, you should know that Voat is not like Facebook or Reddit, where users expect moderators to govern the language people use in order to maintain so-called civil discourse. Voat is about anyone being able to say anything they please, and other users being able to up or downvote as they please, and say whatever they desire in reply. The culture of Voat -- outside of v/pizzagate -- doesn't just accept offensive speech, it revels in it, because it's one of the few places left where there is liberty to sling in around.

Which is why it's the only place folks can post their research into the pedo elite and know it won't be buried, shadowbanned or otherwise shut down.

Furthermore, because anyone can say anything, if you want respect on Voat, you need to be able to defend what you say with supporting material.

v/pizzagate mods are attacked on a regular basis, and no supporting evidence is given in support. Just about every member of this community who is an open-minded, critical thinking contributor with a solid account history has been asked to join the mod team at one point or another over the past almost two years. 90% of them have turned us down because they have witnessed numerous episodes like the one you contributed enthusiastically to last week, in which moderators are lied about, attacked, slandered, blamed and accused of all manner of nasty, immoral motives and behaviors simply for doing their jobs. It is incredibly hard to recruit good moderators for v/pizzagate as a result. In fact, the bashing @srayzie got over researching QAnon's intriguing leaks about VIPedos in v/pizzagate is what led her to create a separate subverse.

As the only active Owner of v/pizzagate, which gets more shilling than anywhere on Voat and requires mods to thin out the shitposts and disinfo to prevent valuable content from being buried, @Crensch is therefore completely within the realm of what is both reasonable and necessary to make the thread he made and demand that those who want to hurt the reputations of mods provide evidence for their claims.

And frankly, what word would you use to describe someone who used the large following they cultivated by posting freely on Voat to tell numerous users that Voat mods gave their IP address to the Cabal so they could send men to her house to assault her? Jem777 took advantage of the safe and focused forum protected 24/7/365 by us mods to make baseless accusations designed to instill fear, distrust and discord in the minds of those we serve.

If that isn't cuntish, I don't know what is.

There is clearly one rule for the mods, who can and do call users 'cunts', and another rule for users, who get some of their pretty pertinent and relevant threads taken down.

Evidence, babe, or GTFO. You'll never have anything removed for bad language, so long as the post follows the rules. And there are far more rules limiting moderators than there are limiting submitters.

Edit: Just reviewed your lovely contributions the day the Jem news broke. You called me an asshole and said I was "crooked" for giving 24 hours grace to Dressage2's rule breaking post that had no links. So you sitting here bitching about foul language and cretinous behavior is farcical.

[–] Vindicator 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[–] Crensch 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Stellar comment. Useful as a reference for quite a few situations that pop up rather often here, I think.

[–] srayzie [S] 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

@Crensch did not make that post on pizzagate. He made it on v/whatever. I’m speaking to you as a user. I am not using mod powers. Voat is free speech. Therefore, I stand by my statement. You’re a cunt.

[–] Piscina 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago  (edited ago)

Thanks for proving my point. I don't know how much you're getting paid and how much you're prostituting yourself out for, but whatever it is it's not worth it. Your reputation is now down the toilet and you've made yourself look cretinous.