Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] darkknight111 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago (edited ago)
https://www.scribd.com/document/63712523/Ted-Gunderson-the-Finders
Not the first time Muller has protected pedophiles. He blocked an investigation into the Finders.
https://mobile.twitter.com/techno_fog/status/999708976936767488?lang=en Epstein. Is this why he got off so lightly.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-mueller-probe-cooperator-is-a-convicted-pedophile
Seems Mueller has a long history of protecting/working with pedophiles. I would NOT be surprised if it is the Pedostas.
[–] awake4646 ago
Should we then be digging into Muller?
[–] darkknight111 ago
Oh hell yeah.
Its time to dig and be completely ruthless about it.
[–] shewhomustbeobeyed 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
https://archive.fo/rzZKs
thedailybeast - https://archive.fo/mrb67
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/robert-mueller-offers-tony-podesta-immunity-to-testify-against-paul-manafort-report
[–] Are_we__sure ago
They idea that this is being hidden from the public is ridiculous. Most everything Mueller knows is hidden from the public. He is not leaking to the press. He is not giving press conferences. The only thing we hear from Robert Mueller is when he files something he court. Last week we didn't know he had the exact names of the folks in the GRU who hacked the DNC and had the emails between the GRU and Wikileaks and the GRU and a US congressional candidate. Now we do. Except he didn' even name Wikileaks, he called them Organization 1.
Mueller is working on active investigations and cases, he is not supposed to mention anything unless he brings charges or not. This is where Comey and the FBI screwed in 2016. They were commenting all over the place on open investigations (except the one into Manafort and Trump and the Trump campaign, that one they denied.) He owes the public and Paul Manafort a fair trial and he owes Manafort and his lawyers all the evidence and witnesses that will be used against him. That does not need to be public before the trial. Here's the evidence that Mueller has against Manafort.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000164-b049-d929-a5e4-b2f9d8e80000
He has had this for a long time with no obligation to tell the public.
[–] ben_matlock [M] ago
hi @meatballpizza,
i'm going to remove the 'unverified' flair since the story is now being reported by multiple mainstream sources
@think-
[–] MeatballPizza [S] ago
Yes. Someone started a new thread on it:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2639245
[–] darkknight111 ago
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/90be7w/holy_shit_mueller_gave_podesta_immunity_the_pedo/
Its true.
That's IT. Its time to dig into Mueller. Be MERCILESS.
NOTHING off limits.
Given he regularly protects pedos, "the D word" is on the table as to what we should do in revenge.
[–] Fateswebb ago
How is this bullshit even slightly legal?
[–] MeatballPizza [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
They did this for Hillary as well. They granted immunity to a number of individuals and got NOTHING in return. For example, the guy who set up her homebrew server where she illegally kept Top Secret and above documents was granted immunity in exchange for...? Shutting up. Shut up and you keep immunity; talk and you're charged with espionage.
[–] think- [M] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Hi @MeatballPizza, since this is only speculation so far, and thegatewaypundig isn't a reliable source, I am going to flair the post 'Unverified'.
[–] darkknight111 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/90be7w/holy_shit_mueller_gave_podesta_immunity_the_pedo/
Its true. Mueller needs to HANG....preferably high from a tree.
[–] KnightsofHubris 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Manafort is charged with acting as unregistered foreign agent for acting on behalf of Ukraine. One the things he did was setup a fake NGO in Belgium that was supposed to look independent, but actually was controlled by Manafort/Ukraine. The NGO in Belgium worked with two US lobbying groups, the Podesta Group (Tony and not John) and Mercury LLC, a Democratic and and Republican shop. This came up in reports last year, but neither Podesta or Mercury were ever indicted. This could mean they were cooperating, that they just turned over documents but were never a target of the investigation. I know that the Podesta group made the NGO send them a legal opinion they were truly independent. If that's legit and the Podesta Group didn't actually know Manafort was behind it, they are not going to be prosecuting, because it would be very had to convict them.
Mueller released a list of 500 pieces of evidence against Manafort today. If Podest Group or Mercury documents are going to be used against Manafort, it would here https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000164-b049-d929-a5e4-b2f9d8e80000
[–] KnightsofHubris 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
from a quick search I don't see Podesta or Mercury or Weber (head of Mercury) on this list. Interestingly enough, several emails to Tad Devine, Bernie's Sanders campaign manager are on this list. Devine used to be a partner with Manafort.