[–] 3141592653 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Do you have a link to their actual website where this info is? re: the link title is "California university's website says its ok for children to engage in etc etc." I will post it if I find it.

edit ok I found it : http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/node/313

It actually doesn't say anything about pornography, let alone that its ok for kids to watch it. Unless I'm missing something here.... BTW I'm not defending anything, just talking specifically about that aspect.

edit again actually, the news article does link to where the website supposedly says that, but the link is down... (was it just taken down recently???)

link: http://www.soc.ucsb.edu/sexinfo/article/basics-sexuality-talking-about-sex-talking-your-child-about-sex-0

it looks like the website goes to a student forum. from the sound of the article, it sounds like a student on the forum made a comment about young people and porn and not being ashamed. NOT SAYING ITS OK, but that's different from it being a statement on their educational pages.

it is NOT OK FOR CHILDREN TO WATCH PORNOGRAPHY. it is in fact very very destructive and damaging.

[–] YogSoggoth 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Kevin Jennings?

[–] 3141592653 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 


[–] new4now 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

motto of NWO

if it feels good do it

damn the consquences

[–] Camulos 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

if it feels good do it

Basically what Alister Crowley lived by.

[–] new4now 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 


NIKE.....just do it

[–] Kekalicious 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Do what thy will.

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 


[–] Enigmatic_Continuum 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Yep, right out of the book 'A Brave New World'.

[–] GreenDell144 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

All I f the ‘obsevations’ made by ‘scientists’ in these studies come from ‘pedophiles’ as they lewdly observe or ‘molest’ children.

There can literally be NO observable untainted, uncriminal data that could be used to make a valid scientific observation or hypothesis. If a child of 4 is observe to masturbating... that is learned behavior. That child learned it when a crime was committed against them. Children just touching or fumbling around the genitals of themselves or others have not been taught any boundaries yet, WHICH IS parental responsibility, IMO. If I see a kids playing that way around my kids, I speak to the parent. If the kids is a toddler or 1-2, the tone of that conversation is friendly and amIicable for sure. Like “don’t worry about it”, “it’s normal, but we try to teach our kids that boundary when we can”. My 1-year-old just discovered that he HAS a penis, because he always has a diaper, so he just wonders what it is, IMO. When he can talk and understand me, we will kindly direct him to more polite boundaries.

Pizzagaters: don’t let sickos fool you with fake science. There are no good parents allowing their kids to be guinea pigs in sex science experiments.

[–] adaya 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The fake science angle is disgusting. just starting red pill on Kinsey & his “experiments”...so disturbing that he’s widely accepted as legit. In protest of normalization, I’m refusing to use any scientific language or preference euphemisms to further legitimize...don’t care if they have a preference, disorder, or a cultural habit...kiddie diddler or baby fucker is respectful as I’m gonna be

[–] ESOTERICshade 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Back when I was growing up the parents would have went to the school and ran these teachers out of the school. Miss those days. People are to afraid of these libtards and their name calling these days.

These teachers would have been fired on the first day they opened their mouth with this shit when I grew up. Cops were scared to touch people without a good reason for fear of being sued. The world has changed so much.

[–] Podge512 [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I must confess to having some very bad thoughts on occasion of what I'd like to do to people like these...

[–] LightlyToasted 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This is intolerable! 4 and 7!!!!!!!

“The majority of sexual play between children takes place between the ages of 4 and 7,” the website states in a section titled “Childhood Sexuality,” accompanied by a photo of two little girls that appear to be kissing on a beach. “Children might display affection to their friends by hugging and kissing, or touching each other’s genitals, which is perfectly normal. Parents should not react in a negative way because children are just exploring.”

It adds that parents should intervene only “if the acts are non-consensual or hurtful.”

In a section titled “Talking To Your Children About Sex” parents are encouraged to let their children watch pornography.

[–] sLnTsRvC 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The page about letting them watch porn isn't working.

[–] LightlyToasted 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

"You are not authorized to access this page."

[–] Kekalicious 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

So did they survey kids and porn and what type? Swedish midget clown skat might be a bit much for the younglings... Never go full retard.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)