Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] WhiteSurvivalist 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Absolute witch hunt. Middle ground, age of marriage is puberty.
[–] 12990554? ago
I always liked the (age/2)+7 method myself ending when the youngest person is 18. So, if one person is 18/2+7=16. So when the youngest person is 16 they are cleared hot to 18. Lets try another one... 14/2+7=14. So if 2 14 year olds are going at it, well thats called horny teenagers. How about 13... See, that is where it breaks down. but basically that is the rough idea .
[–] WhiteSurvivalist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I am concerned with fertility rate, that's it. The proximity age thing, especially two 14 year olds, seems a bit short sighted. 14 year olds with children? I am sure they've got plenty of resources to afford children.
[–] YogSoggoth 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
We never thought about age much growing up in the USA. It was the perverts that made sex weird.
[–] SchlongKeyhote 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
prepare for downvotes from retarded emotional females of both sexes with no historical awareness.
the same ones who cant contemplate the Final Solution which would merely be a mass-scale capital punishment of those who by their own admission have controlled the white-slave sex trade, porn, and sexual blackmail industries. also the same ones who hate on muslims, the only ones who actually do execute rapists.
god wasted brains by giving them to women, they don't even try to use them.