Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] kestrel9 [S] ago
Long story short regarding the answer to that. I looked back to see where I had 'just read' about it earlier today. Turns out that the term 'joint investigation' (as I used it) was a case of unintended conflation while searching and reading on the topic at hand. I was reading a lot of info, also looking at various search pages.
I think I construed the following Fox News timeline excerpt as a "joint announcement" (on the face of it, it reads that way), after reading something right after it. (both below)
the mix up happened after glancing at the following on a search page afterwards
....
So as it turns out, I didn't read FBI and NYPD 'joint investigation' in one article, but unintentionally conflated the two statements above while I was skimming through a lot of info.
Don't have time to address your other questions right now, and I haven't had a chance to read the article regarding Comey, perhaps tomorrow I'll have a chance to read/respond.
[–] Are_we_sure ago
Yeah, both the NYPD and the FBI opened independent investigations, but the FEDS were the first to subpoena the laptop.
[–] kestrel9 [S] ago
I read through the article, here's the section you mentioned:
I had read one discussion that reasoned whether or not Weiner turned over the laptop, as opposed to what comes to mind when reading the term "seized". (sorry don't have it handy)
Couldn't have NYPD investigators or SVU have been given access if there was no urgency, and the FBI was hindered by their computer problems? This case had been 'an unrelated case' to what came later. At some point the HRC linked emails were discovered. Did NYPD Special Victims unit looking through picture files or video files on the computer?
You raised this idea surrounding the FBI agents and NYPD 'big news' story
Here is one blog wondering about FBI malfeasance:
https://angrybearblog.com/2016/10/did-nyc-fbi-agents-plant-those-emails-on-weiners-computer-once-they-gained-custody-of-it-the-evidence-appears-to-suggest-possibly.html
Just another article on the case. Sept 22, 2016 https://archive.li/58ama (3 different groups investigating)
You stated: Doug Hagmann went on Alex Jones with this "fake NYPD has evidence that will turn your stomach story"
This thought came to mind... the NXIVM related 'fright studies', THOSE videos. Any one in a million chance that members or supporters of NXIVM are floating around the background in this NYPD/FBI/Weiner laptop 'video 'story? Just a thought. (in what motive or capacity I've not thought that far)
https://nypost.com/2018/05/05/nxivm-doctor-charged-with-conducting-human-experiments/
https://frankreport.com/2018/05/10/former-nxivm-consultant-pigeon-was-indicted-by-disgraced-ag-schneiderman-was-raniere-behind-it/