1
13

[–] carmencita 1 points 13 points (+14|-1) ago 

The Pedo Shills are here downvoating all of us. Evidently you @hojuriku and we have Hit A Nerve. Good. I don't care.

0
13

[–] Oh_Well_ian 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

2
13

[–] carmencita 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

Upvoat for Posting This. Thank you!

2
11

[–] carmencita 2 points 11 points (+13|-2) ago 

THIS needs Massive Upvoating!

7
5

[–] hojuruku [S] 7 points 5 points (+12|-7) ago 

And it wouldn't even be here if the coup against MF didn't go through ;) thanks guys for fighting in my 11 month excile.

1
10

[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

All you had to do was make another account. I do it every time I get banned for posting material they rip down asap.

2
10

[–] carmencita 2 points 10 points (+12|-2) ago 

You are very welcome. Have an Upvoat!

0
10

[–] jesus_is_lord 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

0
10

[–] sunajAeon 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Well that cancels out the Australian Government as having ANY credibility, legitimacy-2+2 does not equal 1

0
10

[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

It still has zero views as of this comment.

1
6

[–] Vindicator [M] 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

@hojuruku: Could you please clarify which of these links includes a formal ruling by the Australian government that pedophelia is acceptable? That is a bold claim and I can't find a link that support it. In fact, I can't find a link to any ruling at all. All I found was your interpretation of government inaction, which it appears you are calling a "formal ruling":

The fact he is still here is proof that the Australian government has formally ruled someone who identifies as homosexual and likes his child porn is of "good character" and has no character concerns

While I don't dispute the spirit of what you are saying, the way you are saying it is inaccurate and smacks of Fake News, which is the opposite of what we are doing here (research to document the pedo elite). Your inflamed approach undermines the point you are making. I am going to give this our 24 Hour flair to see if you can provide a link to a government ruling of some kind, and perhaps paste in a quote from it, to support the claim in your title. Please reply to this comment when you've done so. Otherwise, you'll need to repost this in v/pizzagatewhatever and we'll need to remove this per Rule 2. Thanks.

7
3

[–] hojuruku [S] 7 points 3 points (+10|-7) ago 

The FACT I COMPLAINED TO IMMIGRATION OVER THE LAST YEAR AND HE'S STILL HERE ON A VISA That only a gay partner of good character can sponsor. Immigration blocked my email address. The law is in the OP. The last thing in it. Read all comments.

So you want me to incriminate myself and release audio of the gay immigration manager fighting with me and the audio of the report being made a year ago to immigration tip off line and them refusing to follow up on it or let me make it again seing no action taken for a year. Ali choundrhy can't be on a refugee visa and if it is it's fraud because if you get your visa cancelled on bad character you can't switch to a new visa I know the law.

You have just gone on all my posts and ask me to re-substiantate whas has been fully substaintated. I'll have to reply to you on all the threads as this attack goes on because I thought I would ask you not to censor someone elses OTO post. Please I don't want a conflict be fair.

You've already taken out a dynamite post if you see the comments I will be linking to in my next discuss post.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)