You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] septimasexta 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This could be true. Assange is credited with never releasing fake dumps. The Clintons and Podesta NEVER DENIED the emails weren't theirs. If something this explosive is released, Wikileaks might be the only credible source the public would trust. There is a problem though. Wouldn't this video (if real) be CP? How could it be legally viewed by the public? Perhaps it will be released directly to Congress as evidence?

[–] migratorypatterns [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Well, the child would have to be blotted out .. No doubt. Certain parts censored. It would be more dramatic like that. To have her talking to the child (THIS IS ALLEGEDLY -- THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THIS EXISTS EXCEPT IN A UNCONFIRMED TWEET) and then turning it into something sick ... yeah, it would seem way more genuine and authentic. I would cry if I saw something like that.

[–] RoundWheel 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Many of the emails were cryptographically signed and have been verified. She can't deny a big chunk of them.