Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Otto- ago (edited ago)
So I wanted to share a small anecdote I heard over 5 years ago, long before I had any knowledge of the trade. Not really related, and it only seems off to me now, but you all know The Lovely Bones, right? A 2009 film, based on a fiction book, set in the 70s about a young girl who was kidnapped, raped and killed by a local paedophile, and the story of the protagonist in the afterlife. A weird interest for me since I've never actually seen it, but I could tell you a lot about behind the scenes and the co-stars involved. Because it was an international co-production between the US, UK and NZ, it was labelled under DreamWorks despite Steven Spielberg having no other involvement (exec produc). Here is a clip of the moment I'm referring to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSOSekoUP6c
Starts at 00:52. Spielberg makes an unexpected visit to the production set early on, and director Peter Jackson talks about how he probably interrupted the focus of the cast by his appearance: "Steven came to visit, which I think was a little difficult for the actors; they didn't know he was coming and um... threw them for a little while. - Things just didn't really click, and Steven was sitting there watching... it not click (chuckles)."
I have no reason to suspect anybody in the cast or crew; Stanley Tucci was notably very reluctant and uncomfortable with playing the villain, his personality and interest in other projects like Spotlight lead me to believe in his good character. And Saoirse Ronan is a girl I've known a lot about for ages, she was brought up by very well-meaning, very protective and level-headed Irish family of Catholic background. They never bought into the materialistic thing and were always standing by the set with their daughter, on every one of her jobs. But something about it now makes me think maybe Steven had an interest in the subject matter more than he should've. All speculation, of course. Who wouldn't be thrown off-key by a renowned director? But it's just something that strikes me as odd now.