Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Otto- 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2235230 I'd argue this wasn't a very necessary repost, but I can still very much sympathise. Something about this story hurt me hard when I first read it, and is what started my more recent spree on PG research, since I usually can't afford the insomnia. This one was a bit different, just from reading the anecdote.
Little disappointed that you never mentioned the writer for the article, even if it is a pseudonym and the story mediated from an anonymous sender. Main reason being that the story is still completely unverifiable. Just something I wanted people to be mindful of, as entertainment gossip is rife with lies and rumours. I am still taken aback by this one for several reasons though.
Even for CD&N, this one is unusually sickening and incriminating. Claims like these are what re-open investigations, if only the sender went forward (and as if there even was an investigation to begin with). There's something else about it, though. What broke me was how suggestive this claim was, causing me to connect the dots myself. How would you create this from those most subtlest and coincidental of details? Something about how that story is told, the way the clues are given and the unbelievably big people it accuses. I have to believe in this one, and I'm trying really hard to be impartial. The dates and explanations offered just fits in. O'Rourke sustaining a ruptured colon, that's**** what they missed, and that high profile-status is how they got away with it. To me it seems to fit perfectly, but none of us can do anything to confirm it. It's not like the JonBenét Ramsey case and all the revelations around that.
So given the implications, I believe that Spielberg at least had to know about it in some incriminating way. So I can't help but rejoice in some deep place when I visit Spielberg's twitter page just now, for the first time ever, and see what kind of feedback he gets these days: https://twitter.com/steveberg1946/status/870172816909377537
That is beautiful. I only knew about Heath O'Rourke through her death, I never grew up with her, but I'm comforted to think that this is finally some way to redeem her fate and aftermath. And to whoever anonymously submitted that story, Odessa, my most heartfelt apologies, regrets, gratitude, and regard for your experience and bravery. You and Leto are awesome guys.
To quote Gorillion from the original voat thread:
"that's the (guessed) RDJ insider Hollywood scandal site. He or somebody very similarly placed as him has obviously just had enough of Hollywood degeneracy and is spilling all the beans. I think choosing O'Rourke as the latest victim story is helping frame in people's minds that this stuff isn't a recent phenomenon. And by comparison, creeps like Weinstein are amateurs at the abuse game."
[–] carmencita 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
One of many responses to Spielberg's Twitter: https://twitter.com/steveberg1946/status/870172816909377537 This Speaks Volumes. @millennial_vulcan
[–] millennial_vulcan 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
WOKE! Carm, I hope this story never dies. I hope there will be a lynch mob out for blood, to get justice for Heather. I keep having flashes of Heather screaming out for help in a back room somewhere and nobody, not even her parents are there for her.
Oh this is just awful. Somebody please do something.