Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] vahelper 1 point 9 points 10 points (+10|-1) ago
Seems like you are right but be careful not to look like you are demonizing the victims.
[–] Mad_As_Hell [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Good point, not my intention at all. Weinstein is a scumbag regardless.
[–] GeorgeT 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Joe Rogan did a piece on Harvey and he said exactly what my sister (She's a DJ who is in the curcles) said - 'how many women actually came onto him in hope to get the part? Will these women (in the 100's or 1000's step forward please and tell the audience how you stole parts from your fellow (more talanted) sisters!!! No one mentioned that factor except Joe! (Again, I am not defendinf Harvey one iota, masturbating in a potted plant in front of a clothed woman is not something I can defend)
[–] new4now 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It's said that Gwyneth Paltrow stole the script of Shakespeare In Love from her best friend Winona Ryder and went to get the part behind her back
It's also said Paltrow was caught in a comprising position with Harvey that caused the break up of her and Pitt
Harvey was an easy target cause he's a pig
Easy targets work wonders for cover ups
I personally question some of the women that came out
It was about time the casting couch came out, and we know Harvey isn't the only one that does it
Glad it came out, but why was it Harvey?
How many more do these women know about and had to deal with, but only came out to accuse Harvey ?
Where are the gay men stories of the casting couch?
Where has this story gone?
Heard some women are getting together to do something, but haven't heard anything since
It popped and now looks like it's fading, except for Rose
Makes you wonder
[–] WeWillWin 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Looks like this is their next phase: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/02/times-up-streep-aniston-donate-500000-to-anti-harassment-campaign.html
[–] Pablolove 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
That's a completely separate issue. As usual deflection deflection. The guys a prolific sex beast, raping and molesting, terrorising women to indulge his own pathetic ego. Why are people so terrified to confront these issues? You stop pandering.
[–] GeorgeT 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago (edited ago)
But it gets more intriguing - in 2016 Harvey and DeNiro were denied airing their film VAXXED (anti vaccine movie) at Tribecca film Festival 2016 - and in 2017 Harvey decided to launch his own independent marketing - and that was it! Now we know why he became the target. And of course he took attention of Keanu Reeve's story about Adrenochrome!!!! Note Adrenochrome is mentioned in H.S.Thompson's famous FALILV - it is actually derived from a blood of a terrorised victim.
[–] Pringle 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Vaxxed was not a Harvey or DeNiro film. It was a Del Bigtree and Andrew Wakefield documentary that was not allowed to be shown at the Sundance Festival.
[–] GeorgeT 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It was Vaxxed, Tribecca Film Festival - I stand corrected (Harvey and Deniro produced it)
[–] Votescam ago
Anyone with children should see this documentary ... VAXXED.
Especially if you're AA and have children.
[–] Aasb 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Interesting. I doubt that Keanu Reeve's interview is real, same with Jim Carrey's "hollywood eats babies" interview. For me that sounds more like damage control by shills. You take a serious subject, you create a fake interview which feels real, people think its real until its proven fake. The next time you mention that subject.. "oh that never happened, it was fake..move on to another subject"
[–] GeorgeT ago
Yup, add to that, Macauly Culkin's revalation about a Hollywood mogul telling him that he was wearing boots made of human leather (Heather O'Rourke) - find it very hard to believe.
[–] WeWillWin ago
"Keanu Reeve's story about Adrenochrome!" - never heard anything about this, any links?
[–] Kacey 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I just google "adrenochrome reeve" and saw a bunch of stuff including earlier voat posts. Here is one link http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2017/11/hollywood-elites-use-blood-of-babies-to-get-high-keanu-reeves-video-3574287.html However beforeitsnews may not be the most reliable website. So do your own research if you are interested. I believe that several people have had submissions about adrenochrome deleted.
Per https://consciousawarenessforall.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/adrenochrome/
If babies and children are being sacrificed as well as sexually abused to garner this "drug" it seems that submissions on adrenecrome are relevant and should not be deleted
Here is the wiki entry on adrenechrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrome
[–] PussySmasher6000 ago
Interesting. I didn't know that. Thank you.
[–] Unreasonable 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
Typically those are called "limited hangouts".
They did it specifically to try to "frontrun" the actual scandal, and to sling some mud at Trump. Didn't work though. None of their tricks work anymore. Must be very frustrating to be a satan worshiper these days.
[–] Joe10jo 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Ha! I’ve often thought the same thing! Like what’s Hilary thinking, that she’s done something to offend Moloch?? Pissed off Baal? Lol
[–] DeathToMasonsASAP 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
No, they don't go to jail and act with impunity. Reality check.
[–] think- 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I think both is true: Weinstein behaved like a pig and harassed women, and at some point, he pissed off some powerful people behind the scenes who decided to axe him.
That some of his alleged victims have an occult connection is not surprising, as we have established that the majority is into this shit in Hollyweird.
I don't know whether Rose McGowan is legit, but I would be careful slamming all of his alleged victims.
[–] Kacey 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Good points!
[–] think- 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks, @Kacey. :-)
[–] Cheesebooger 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
He must've rubbed the wrong person the wrong way. his arrogance is known. It is normal culture for his kind to be sexual degenerates.
[–] Piscina 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I often wonder how and why Weinstein got outed and became the sacrificial lamb for Hollywood. How was it planned and for what purpose?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] Matt_Helm 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Correct. Harvey is such a fat ugly obnoxious bastard it was easy to expose him and ruin him but he knows a lot of deep dark secrets, if he wants to he could cut a deal and go into witness protection but first they have to arrest him then tighten the screws on him to see who he can give up with regard to the Hollywood pedo network, if he does that he'll avoid hard time in prison. He might already be doing this in secret to avoid prosecution for raping women.
[–] CLIPTO 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Late to the show here but for sure, the Weinstein thing is a smokescreen. His scandal is the most publicly digestible on they can dole out there at the moment. Most people are not ready to digest the scandals surrounding people like Bryan Singer and Dan Schneider, so they could perhaps be burning Weinstein at the stake to satisfy the masses and cover for even more depraved predators. The way I see it, Weinstein is the least of our worries.