Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
Sort: Top
[–] Vindicator [M] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
@dreamdigital: I'm giving this an "Accuracy in Question" flair because the tweet replies in that thread say Alefantis would have only been 19 when that pic was taken. Plus, he's wearing an old man hat that no gay dude would be caught dead in. While Alefantis may indeed be a Rothschilde, this pic is not good evidence for it.
[–] dreamdigital [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Very well. I still conclude he may not have come out of the closet back then and also trends were different back then. And I'm 90% sure that's him.
[–] dreamdigital [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Think about this also, Lynn De Rothschild hangs out around David Brock, or hung out around David Brock. This would connect a lot of pieces if true.
[–] shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Do you really think that is JimCom? Is there an enlargement of the print anywhere? Do you know what year the picture was taken?
[–] carmencita ago
Thanks for asking those questions. I am wondering as well. Let's hope we get an answer.
[–] shewhomustbeobeyed ago
Yeah, I'm not gonna hold my breath waitin' on that answer.
[–] derram ago
https://tweetsave.com/deepstvte/status/930143983837368321 :
This has been an automated message.
[–] dreamdigital [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
I have begun a tweet storm of this.
Tweet to Media Matters
[–] carmencita 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Wow ! You really are Gutsy. Congrats. Hope there is an answer.
[–] Yuke 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
I didn't buy the Rothschild thing the first time I heard it, and never have, for many reasons. As Vindicator has highlighted Alefantis would have been quite young. I've also never seen a picture of him wearing glasses. etc etc etc...