Pizzagate Subverse Network
/v/AskPizzagate – Pizzagate-related questions
/v/pizzagatewhatever – anything Pizzagate-related
/v/PizzagateMemes – Pizzagate memes
/v/pizzagatemods – meta concerns and Pizzagate moderation discussion
For Newcomers
Submission Rules
See also "subverse best practices"
Policy on linking dangerous research
1: Relevance: Posts must be directly relevant to investigation of Pizzagate: the sexual/physical abuse and/or murder of children by elites, child trafficking organized by elites, and/or cover-up of these activities and/or the protection/assistance provided to the people who engage in said activities. See definition of Pizzagate and examples of relevant posts.
2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link. If you ask a question: Explain what led to your question and provide sources. If you present opinion/argument, connect your dots and provide sources for them. Avoid baseless speculation. ALL posts must include at least one link.
3: Clarity: All titles must adequately describe post content and must establish direct relevance to pizzagate. EACH link in your post must include a description of content and how the link relates to the post (except when markup is used to embed links in the specific text they support).
4: Meta submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. Please submit indirectly relevant posts to /v/pizzagatewhatever and unsourced questions to /v/AskPizzagate. Sourced activism / publicity posts and memes are allowed. Posts about the subverse itself go to /v/pizzagatemods.
5: You must label NSFW posts (“Not safe for work”; for example gore, nudity etc.) as such when submitting.
6: No Link Posts -- Only editable submissions made with the "Discuss" button are allowed. "Link" submissions have been banned by the community for the reasons described here. Link posts will be immediately removed.
Adspam, illegal content, and personal info about Voat subscribers will be removed, and the offender will be banned.
Moderator Rules and Removal Explanations
Submission Removal Log
WARNING! Due to the nature of this investigation, clicking some links could result in opening incriminating material. Always practice common sense before clicking links, and make sure you're browsing safely.
Use archive.is to archive sources.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] eucalyptus_spearmint 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Conservative here. It's never that simple. It's about good and evil, not conservative/liberal. Also, you may be confusing liberalism with radical leftists. Some of the greatest minds in history have been liberal thinkers. Liberal is relative, as is conservative. You can be a conservative Muslim and think it is ok to slice off a girl's private parts, or a liberal Democrat that advocates for zero restrictions on abortion. But yes, we are definitely reaping what we've sown for the past forty or fifty (more?) years and the harvest is quite rotten. Someone did a study that basically linked all kinds of downward social trends to the year that the supreme court of the U.S. took the daily morning prayer out of public schools...Satan really scored a victory that year. He'll score another one when "In God We Trust" is removed from our money.
[–] novictim 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I upvoated you for your sentiment but I don't think your comment above is anything more than just another symptom of the cause. The CAUSE is Communists/Cultural Marxists and the damaging blitzkrieg of Post Modernism. We have been losing the battle of ideas because we have failed to recall our own history and the values that represent the Enlightenment.
Jesus was arguably the most important Enlightenment thinker but the Roman Church buried his ideas and truths under a pile of Latin Prayers and Rituals. It took Martin Luther, the next most significant Enlightenment catalyst, to unearth the core and fundamental notions that underpin the Christian ethos. That was 5 centuries ago. And then, of course, you have the others who synthesize the political implications of the Message of Jesus and others, like Spinoza, who distill elements of this fundamental message. Thomas Paine and John Locke take the argument to the political leadership and voila!, the notions of democracy and Tolerance bulldoze the corrupt power structures that kept everyone subjugated for centuries.
But now we are in a vacuum of forgetting and the Critical Theorists have entered this space as though the younger generation were Tabula Rasa, free of all prior wisdom. And that is not wrong. The System of Education has been captured as have the MSM outlets. What is needed is for the irrefutable arguments of the past that created the Enlightenment to make a brand new debut. So far, there is little sign that this is happening except from a few speakers like Jordan Peterson, folks that rarely are allowed a platform.
[–] eucalyptus_spearmint ago (edited ago)
I feel like it's splitting hairs either way. I could argue that the abolition of school prayer gave Satan the "in" he needed for said Marxism to gain a foothold, but I don't have a magical window into the realm of the spirit. I just think it's an awfully strong coincidence if the statistics are valid. I've always been taught that "the prayer of a righteous man availeth much" and "whatsoever ye ask in Christ's name", etc. In short, prayer is nothing to shrug at. I truly believe the gains being made today are a result of MANY prayers and without CONTINUED prayer, repentance, faith in God, what we are seeing is but a brief respite...
And yes, Jordan Peterson is pretty great! 👍
[–] thebearfromstartrack 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
When I'm being "racist" I'm speaking in GENERAL, not absolutes. I KNOW it's now that simple. What you are explaining to me, is what I already am aware of. I'm speaking to the overarching effect on EVERYONE.
Speaking of Satan, it probably wasn't a good idea to allow mainstream protestant churches to STOP teaching the Bible (chapter by chapter and verse by verse) and START social (anti poverty) activism...This is WOMEN who are SUPPOSED to shut the fuck up in church.
ALSO, not a good idea to have them teach that everyone is EQUAL,,,,GIVEN (Bible) the WARNINGS about kenites, tares, BAD figs.
The Key of David is "real" and it DOES close doors that CANNOT be reopened and OPEN doors that CANNOT be closed to those who possess it.
Mortal life is DIFFICULT until you HAVE that key.
[–] eucalyptus_spearmint 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I cannot ABIDE the way you CAPITALIZE various words at RANDOM as if this will cause the READER to be more easily INFLUENCED somehow. Also, I'm guilty of cursing when I get angry sometimes, heaven knows, God forgive me... but it's not expedient or Christ-like to drop f-bombs or racial slurs while spreading the message of God. Neither is it kind. Can you imagine Jesus calling people niggers? Does that fit with what you know of the savior of mankind? No? Then stop doing it and stop defending it! As for this stuff about the Key of David...I've only heard of Solomon's Key. As you may know, he was the son of David and a King of Israel, and he dabbled in witchcraft, idolatry, adultery, and lead Israel astray. I'll not be messing around with his grimoires of demons, thank you. As far as women being forbidden to speak in church, I'm not sure how this is even relevant top the topic at hand but since you brought it up...you will not find any God fearing house of Christian worship that requires total silence of women. Strong cases can be made against women holding positions of authority over men in the church (Yes I'm a woman and I do believe that is what the Bible teaches!) but the verse you are referring to is generally thought to be about women disrupting the service by asking questions because they struggled with the language. They were told to be quiet during the sermon and ask their husbands at home. 😌 Smh.....