0
10

[–] GREENBUT 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago  (edited ago)

this is my favorite part

This matter was thoroughly and exhaustively examined by the mainstream media during the 2016 campaign, leading to the definitive conclusion that Clinton played no role. That didn’t stop Trump from pounding his “beleaguered” attorney general, as recently as Nov. 3, to demand that the Justice Department open a criminal investigation of his defeated opponent. "

like we are suppose to just go with what the MSM says hahahahahahah such a cry baby

0
2

[–] WhereWeLiveNow 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I use to believe cops, detectives, etc.. examine evidence relating to possible criminal activity. I am glad Johnny-boy corrected my beliefs. I know now the cucks in MSM are the only ones that do investigative work.

0
3

[–] BigMatteson 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He prefers Skippy.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

good point.

0
9

[–] ThePuppetShow 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

LOL this fucker just referenced the Federalist papers and he's one of the people trying to say the second amendment was meant for the "militia". It clearly says in the Federalist papers that the people are the militia. Fuck you John Podesta and your rules for radicals. We know you're blaming everyone else for what you do. Tick tock bitch, the rope is ready.

0
0

[–] nameof [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Yeah good read on the psychopathic bs

0
8

[–] HennyPenny 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

"As a younger man, when I came to work as a trial attorney at the Justice Department, it was impossible to enter the building without seeing the murals that majestically but plainly reminded us of our traditions and our duty"

What "majestic" and "traditional" murals did you have on your office walls, Podesta? What do they remind you of???

0
1

[–] nameof [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks for getting the irony here. Thanks alot that's where I'm coming from too.

3
-2

[–] StephenPaddock 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

He is making a reference to Majestic 12.

@ThePuppetShow @janet58 @GreenDell144 @DerivaUK @Oh_Well_Ian

Where is the evidence against skiptron?

0
7

[–] Hortance 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Sorry John. Trump's your Daddy now.

0
4

[–] Gbuggers 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Love your comment how perfect. Do these trump haters not realize how guilty they make them selves look? Whats in your closet John Podesta? Look at Stephen Colbert he dedicates the first half of his show to hating on Trump every night? I hope one of these indictments are for him because he sure is screaming come look in my closet.

0
3

[–] Hortance 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Thanks. And oh yeah, Podesta is poison now. I can't recall a single person defending him, either. They know.

I really think Trump team has a bunch of stuff and is the source for a lot thats come out and will come out....They throw high cards and then somebody throws a trump card on it. (Not trying to be cute, its just the best analogy I could come up with...) So many squirmy dogs, indulging in every kind of indecency, just waiting to see if the next shoe dropped is on them....Sucks to be them!

2
-1

[–] StephenPaddock 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

0
1

[–] Hortance 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Shower, do your hair, have a nice, overdue douche and study a bit for your algebra quiz tomorrow, sweetheart. Grownups are talking....

0
6

[–] GreenDell144 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

For more than a year now, this guy has been rollin his turds in sugar and tryin to convince us they’re donuts. Hopefully soon he’s gonna hasta eat em himself.

0
2

[–] Vindicator 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Nice metaphor 😂

0
1

[–] nameof [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Interesting and powerful how things are shifting.

0
6

[–] SteveB1945 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

First the bullshit. Then the whining. Then the begging. Finally the perp walk.

0
2

[–] paulieweb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I know. The most amazing part of his response is how low-energy it is...

“the Department of Justice can never be used to retaliate politically against opponents, and that would be wrong.” Except that seems to be precisely what is going on. This is what authoritarians and tyrants do. They use the instruments of state power, particularly the wrath of the prosecutor, to rain opprobrium down upon citizens with whom they disagree.>

Seems to be what's going on? John, you were there, smack dab in the middle of the entire Uranium One deal. You should be able to confidently and on-record say that is what's going on. I mean it's your own free-writing safe space in the CIA Gazette, no-one's editing you.

"This is what authoritarians and tyrants do." Are you calling him a dictator, a tyrant? Are you legitimately afraid he'll lock you up for no good reason? If so wouldn't you protest much more loudly? Instead it's just the same "this is how you should think and feel about this" rather than any genuine concern for his own well-being if what he "believes" was true.

0
0

[–] nameof [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hard laughter

1
6

[–] argosciv 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Wait, is this seriously from Podesta himself?

FUCKING LOL!

Oh John, you have no fucking idea what's coming your way, do you?

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

2
0

[–] StephenPaddock 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Well actually considering Vlad is related to Bush I would say it is a rather odd choice.

0
0

[–] nameof [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I'm just getting in reading all these awesome comments and got this one no....I'm not Podesta!! Funny u! So glad to be here getting these messages first I thought it was just the ericpaddock guy and hes spamming and saying this wrong shit then yeah people who are getting just the fact that the language in podestas article is so like the interview he squims, he uses words that are uncomfortable to say or strange. It's icky. And that's the point. The man is blaming and shaming, because it's possible he doesn't think there's anything wrong with selling uranium or whatever he's in trouble for. I think the fatherhood video sounds alot like him, that's a scary video. But none of us know how this is Really gonna unravel. That's what my brother says, and he's smart. You can't know.

1
0

[–] argosciv 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Oh shit I just realized that you think that I think that you're John... no, not at all!

I just strongly suspect he's here reading and/or has his cronies doing the same.

1
-1

[–] argosciv 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Haha, yeah don't worry, plenty here can see through the shit, some even further than others.

John is neck deep in it and I'm sure he and his brother, up to an extent, realize that much - but, if this is their best move, they have no clue what's coming for them - or they do and they think they can fight it, not sure, it's hilarious, though.

But none of us know how this is Really gonna unravel. That's what my brother says, and he's smart. You can't know.

With respect, I must say, some things absolutely can be known just that sometimes it takes a while to present and/or obstacles present themselves, sometimes it's hard to explain how you know something before the evidence is available, etc... Saying that we can never know anything, is tantamount to solipsism, which so far as I can tell, is a mind-trap to prevent people from ever bothering to look into the curiosities of existence.

That said, just because someone claims to know something, doesn't mean they aren't open to new information which changes their perspective. I mean, just to poke a grand hole in solipsism... if we can't know anything, how do we know that we can't know anything? ;)

0
4

[–] DerivaUK 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Ordinarily, this would have made me seethe. But today I allow myself a silent and knowing smile.

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)